Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090321›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

ESR Essentials: image guided drainage of fluid collections-practice recommendations by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.

Anna Maria Ierardi, Carolina Lanza, Marco Calandri, Dimitrios Filippiadis, Velio Ascenti, Gianpaolo Carrafiello

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna Maria IerardiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy. amierardi@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-8018
Carolina LanzaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Marco CalandriDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Dimitrios Filippiadis2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON," Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Velio AscentiPostgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo CarrafielloDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This ESR Essentials article intends to provide detailed, step-by-step, information on the role of imaging in the diagnosis, procedural management, and follow-up of patients with fluid collections. Evidence-based medicine recommendations for the positioning of percutaneous drainages and/or for diagnostic/therapeutic aspiration of fluid collections are provided. Although medical history, clinical symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests can raise suspicions regarding a collection, an imaging assessment is usually necessary for the diagnosis. Radiologists can easily identify fluid collections that are clinically suspected by using a wide range of imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, CT, MRI, and cone-beam CT. Consequently, these imaging methods (either alone or combined), can be used to aspirate the collection or for the placement of a drainage catheter. The choice of imaging technique to be used is influenced by the location of the collection, operator preference, size, and content of the collection. In addition, it is of utmost importance to underline the role of the interventional radiologist in the management and follow-up of patients with percutaneous drains, in collaboration with surgeons, clinicians, and diagnostic radiologists. KEY POINTS: Indications for percutaneous imaging-guided drainage are supported by clinical findings, laboratory tests, and pre-procedural imaging. Deciding between aspiration or drain insertion should follow patient assessment and fluid collection characterization. The interventional radiologist should be part of the entire patient care process including follow-up.

Indexed as

DrainageRadiography, InterventionalEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineHumansSocieties, MedicalFluid collectionsInterventional radiologyPercutaneous drainage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.