Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090303›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2024

Asymmetry in the Perception of Electrical Chirps Presented to Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Ana Šodan, Sabine Meunier, Vincent Péan, Jean-Pierre Lavieille, Stéphane Roman, Olivier Macherey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana ŠodanAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA UMR 7031, 13013, Marseille, France. sodan.anaa@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4226-9568
Sabine MeunierAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA UMR 7031, 13013, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-4716
Vincent PéanMED-EL France, 75012, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre LavieilleDepartment of ORL, Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics, LDV unit, 13002, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-5791
Stéphane RomanInstitut de Neurosciences des systèmes, Inserm UMR1106, Aix-Marseille Univ., 13005, Marseille, France.
Olivier MachereyAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, LMA UMR 7031, 13013, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-3032

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche 2017/1761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough a broadband acoustic click is physically the shortest duration sound we can hear, its peripheral neural representation is not as short because of cochlear filtering. The traveling wave imposes frequency-dependent delays to the sound waveform so that in response to a click, apical nerve fibers, coding for low frequencies, are excited several milliseconds after basal fibers, coding for high frequencies. Nevertheless, a click sounds like a click and these across-fiber delays are not perceived. This suggests that they may be compensated by the central auditory system, rendering our perception consistent with the external world. This explanation is difficult to evaluate in normal-hearing listeners because the contributions of peripheral and central auditory processing cannot easily be disentangled. Here, we test this hypothesis in cochlear implant listeners for whom cochlear mechanics is bypassed.

methodEight cochlear implant users ranked in perceived duration 12 electrical chirps of various physical durations and spanning the cochlea in the apex-to-base or base-to-apex direction (Exp. 1). Late-latency cortical potentials were also recorded in response to a subset of these chirps (Exp. 2).

resultsWe show that an electrical chirp spanning the cochlea from base-to-apex is perceived as shorter than the same chirp spanning the cochlea in the opposite direction despite having the same physical duration. Cortical potentials also provide neural correlates of this asymmetry in perception.

conclusionThese results demonstrate that the central auditory system processes frequency sweeps differently depending on the direction of the frequency change and that this processing difference is not simply the result of peripheral filtering.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCochlear implantsLate-latency auditory evoked potentialTravelling wave delay

Identifiers

PMID39090303
PMCPMC11527866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.