Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090261›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Skin cancer detection through attention guided dual autoencoder approach with extreme learning machine.

Ritesh Maurya, Satyajit Mahapatra, Malay Kishore Dutta, Vibhav Prakash Singh, Mohan Karnati, Geet Sahu, Nageshwar Nath Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ritesh MauryaAmity Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Amity University, Noida, India.
Satyajit MahapatraDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. satyajit.mahapatra@manipal.edu.
Malay Kishore DuttaAmity Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Amity University, Noida, India.
Vibhav Prakash SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Allahabad, India.
Mohan KarnatiComputer Science and Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492010, India.
Geet SahuAmity Centre for Artificial Intelligence, Amity University, Noida, India.
Nageshwar Nath PandeyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, ITER, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer is a lethal disease, and its early detection plays a pivotal role in preventing its spread to other body organs and tissues. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based automated methods can play a significant role in its early detection. This study presents an AI-based novel approach, termed 'DualAutoELM' for the effective identification of various types of skin cancers. The proposed method leverages a network of autoencoders, comprising two distinct autoencoders: the spatial autoencoder and the FFT (Fast Fourier Transform)-autoencoder. The spatial-autoencoder specializes in learning spatial features within input lesion images whereas the FFT-autoencoder learns to capture textural and distinguishing frequency patterns within transformed input skin lesion images through the reconstruction process. The use of attention modules at various levels within the encoder part of these autoencoders significantly improves their discriminative feature learning capabilities. An Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) with a single layer of feedforward is trained to classify skin malignancies using the characteristics that were recovered from the bottleneck layers of these autoencoders. The 'HAM10000' and 'ISIC-2017' are two publicly available datasets used to thoroughly assess the suggested approach. The experimental findings demonstrate the accuracy and robustness of the proposed technique, with AUC, precision, and accuracy values for the 'HAM10000' dataset being 0.98, 97.68% and 97.66%, and for the 'ISIC-2017' dataset being 0.95, 86.75% and 86.68%, respectively. This study highlights the possibility of the suggested approach for accurate detection of skin cancer.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAutoencoderConvolution neural networksDeep learningExtreme learning machineSkin lesion classification

Identifiers

PMID39090261
PMCPMC11294626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.