ArticleScientific reports2024
MIPs: multi-locus intron polymorphisms in species identification and population genomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosome-level genome of the Adriatic sturgeon, Acipenser naccarii: A resource for polyploid fish genomics.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- Intronomics-MIP: a snakemake pipeline for analyzing multilocus intron polymorphisms in species identification and population genomics.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Application of an Anchor Mapping of Alien Chromosome (AMAC) Fragment Localization Method in the Identification of Radish Chromosome Segments in the Progeny of Rape-Radish Interspecific Hybrids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of species groups in which the presence of interspecific hybridization or introgression phenomena is known or suspected involves analysing shared bi-parentally inherited molecular markers. Current methods are based on different categories of markers among which the classical microsatellites or the more recent genome wide approaches for the analyses of thousands of SNPs or hundreds of microhaplotypes through high throughput sequencing. Our approach utilizes intron-targeted amplicon sequencing to characterise multi-locus intron polymorphisms (MIPs) and assess genetic diversity. These highly variable intron regions, combined with inter-specific transferable loci, serve as powerful multiple-SNP markers potentially suitable for various applications, from species and hybrid identification to population comparisons, without prior species knowledge. We developed the first panel of MIPs highly transferable across fish genomes, effectively distinguishing between species, even those closely related, and populations with different structures. MIPs offer versatile, hypervariable nuclear markers and promise to be especially useful when multiple nuclear loci must be genotyped across different species, such as for the monitoring of interspecific hybridization. Moreover, the relatively long sequences obtained ease the development of single-locus PCR-based diagnostic markers. This method, here demonstrated in teleost fishes, can be readily applied to other taxa, unlocking a new source of genetic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.