Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090211›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impact of virgin and recycled polymer fibers on the rheological properties of cemented paste backfill.

Zhuoqun Yu, Wenjun Kong, Zhiqiang Ji, Yongyan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhuoqun YuYantai University, Qiangquan Road No.30, Yantai, China. yzqun2007@126.com.
Wenjun KongYantai University, Qiangquan Road No.30, Yantai, China.
Zhiqiang JiYantai University, Qiangquan Road No.30, Yantai, China.
Yongyan WangQingdao University of Science and Technology, Songling Road No.99, Qingdao, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation Project of China 42071080National Natural Science Foundation Project of China 51674149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The addition of polymer fibers to cemented paste backfill (CPB) has shown promise in enhancing mechanical properties, although it also introduces changes in rheological characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different types of polymer fibers, namely virgin commercial polypropylene fiber (CPPF), recycled tire polymer fiber (RTPF), and recycled tire rubber fiber (RF), on the rheological properties of CPB mixtures through an experimental program, and provide design references for CPB pipeline transport. The results revealed consistent reductions in bulk density upon the incorporation of polymer fibers into CPB, alongside varying impacts on slump. Specifically, the addition of CPPF had a mild effect, while RTPF caused a continuous decrease in slump, and RF exhibited minimal influence up to a 4% concentration, with substantial effects thereafter. Moreover, the inclusion of fibers led to increases in apparent viscosity parameters, with RTPF inducing the most significant changes, followed by varying responses from CPPF and RF. When using RTPF for CPB reinforcement, emphasis should be placed on enhancing technical indicators related to viscosity such as energy consumption and pipeline wear during pipeline transport. Furthermore, adjustments were necessary to account for flow curve instability resulting from interactions between fibers and the paddle, with the data aligning well with the Bingham model. The addition of fibers, particularly CPPF and RF, primarily influenced plastic viscosity rather than yield stress, underscoring the limitations of slump tests in assessing rheology.

Indexed as

Polymer fibersRecycled materialsTailingsWaste tire

Identifiers

PMID39090211
PMCPMC11294357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.