ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of virgin and recycled polymer fibers on the rheological properties of cemented paste backfill.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of Rice Husk-Reinforced Eco-Friendly Mine Backfill Material.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early-age strength evolution and brittle-to-ductile transition mechanism of basalt-fiber-reinforced cemented gangue backfill.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The addition of polymer fibers to cemented paste backfill (CPB) has shown promise in enhancing mechanical properties, although it also introduces changes in rheological characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the influence of different types of polymer fibers, namely virgin commercial polypropylene fiber (CPPF), recycled tire polymer fiber (RTPF), and recycled tire rubber fiber (RF), on the rheological properties of CPB mixtures through an experimental program, and provide design references for CPB pipeline transport. The results revealed consistent reductions in bulk density upon the incorporation of polymer fibers into CPB, alongside varying impacts on slump. Specifically, the addition of CPPF had a mild effect, while RTPF caused a continuous decrease in slump, and RF exhibited minimal influence up to a 4% concentration, with substantial effects thereafter. Moreover, the inclusion of fibers led to increases in apparent viscosity parameters, with RTPF inducing the most significant changes, followed by varying responses from CPPF and RF. When using RTPF for CPB reinforcement, emphasis should be placed on enhancing technical indicators related to viscosity such as energy consumption and pipeline wear during pipeline transport. Furthermore, adjustments were necessary to account for flow curve instability resulting from interactions between fibers and the paddle, with the data aligning well with the Bingham model. The addition of fibers, particularly CPPF and RF, primarily influenced plastic viscosity rather than yield stress, underscoring the limitations of slump tests in assessing rheology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.