ArticleScientific reports2024
Screening of reliable reference genes for the normalization of RT-qPCR in chicken liver tissues and LMH cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of the Avian Mitochondrial-Derived Peptide MOTS-c and Its Potential Role as a Metabolic Regulator.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The liver plays a vital role in lipid synthesis and metabolism in poultry. To study the functional genes more effectively, it is essential to screen of reliable reference genes in the chicken liver, including females, males, embryos, as well as the Leghorn Male Hepatoma (LMH) cell line. Traditional reference gene screening involves selecting commonly used housekeeping genes (HKGs) for RT-qPCR experiments and using different algorithms to identify the most stable ones. However, this approach is limited in selecting the best reference gene from a small pool of HKGs. High-throughput sequencing technology may offer a solution to this limitation. This study aimed to identify the most consistently expressed genes by utilizing multiple published RNA-seq data of chicken liver and LMH cells. Subsequently, the stability of the newly identified reference genes was assessed in comparison to previously validated stable poultry liver expressed reference genes and the commonly employed HKGs using RT-qPCR. The findings indicated that there is a higher degree of similarity in stable expression genes between female and male liver (such as LSM14A and CDC40). In embryonic liver, the optimal new reference genes were SUDS3, TRIM33, and ERAL1. For LMH cells, the optimal new reference genes were ALDH9A1, UGGT1, and C21H1orf174. However, it is noteworthy that most HKGs did not exhibit stable expression across multiple samples, indicating potential instability under diverse conditions. Furthermore, RT-qPCR experiments proved that the stable expression genes identified from RNA-seq data outperformed commonly used HKGs and certain validated reference genes specific to poultry liver. Over all, this study successfully identified new stable reference genes in chicken liver and LMH cells using RNA-seq data, offering researchers a wider range of reference gene options for RT-qPCR in diverse situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.