Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090200›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2024

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted comparative laparoscopic surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Hao Shi, Xianhao Yi, Xin Yan, Wenjie Wu, Hui Ouyang, Chengke Ou, Xiangheng Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao Shi *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Xianhao Yi *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Xin YanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Wenjie WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Hui OuyangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Chengke OuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China.
Xiangheng ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, No. 69 Chuanshan Road, Shigu District, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China. cw9771@163.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province No. 2018SK51605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA meta-analysis was conducted on the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer. There are few articles and reports on this topic, and a lack of high-quality research results in unreliable research conclusions. This study includes prospective and retrospective studies to obtain more reliable findings. MATERIALS AND

methodsDatabases were searched, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The search was conducted from the time of database construction to March 2024. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the NOS scoring system. Meta-analysis was performed using R language software. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I

resultsSix relevant literatures that met the criteria were finally included, and 652 patients were included, including 316 (48.5%) in the robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer group (RLLND) and 336 (51.5%) in the laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer group (LLLND). Analysis of the results showed that compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had less mean intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 22, 95% CI - 40.03 to - 3.97, P < 0.05), longer operative time (MD = 51.57, 95%CI 7.69 to 95.45, P < 0.05), and a shorter mean hospital stay (MD = - 1.25, 95%CI - 2.46 to - 0.05, P < 0.05), a low rate of urinary complications (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.64, P < 0.01), a low overall rate of postoperative complications (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.42 to 0.87, P < 0.01), and a high number of lateral lymph node dissection (MD = 1.18, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.23, P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative anastomotic leakage, postoperative intestinal obstruction, and total number of lymph nodes obtained (P > 0.05).

conclusionCompared with laparoscopy, robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer reduces intraoperative blood loss, shortens the average length of hospital stay, reduces urologic complications, decreases overall postoperative complications, and collects more lateral lymph nodes. However, the surgical time is prolonged.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeLaparoscopicLateral lymph node dissectionRectal cancerRobotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.