ArticleScientific reports2024
A new possibilistic-based clustering method for probability density functions and its application to detecting abnormal elements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cluster analysis can also detect abnormalities besides building a basis for identifying elements into clusters. Detecting abnormalities is a highly developed feature in the field of unsupervised learning. However, existing studies have mainly focused on discrete data, not probability density functions. This paper enables a possibilistic approach to solving the clustering for probability density functions dealing with abnormal elements. First, the data are extracted using the density function. Then, they are passed through the proposed algorithm to produce a possibilistic partition. Finally, a decision rule is established to recognize which function is abnormal. We compare the proposed algorithm with baseline algorithms in clustering PDFs, such as k-means, FCF, and Self-Updated Clustering. The results of three numerical examples applied to the image are typical for this new method. Furthermore, The proposed algorithm reaches accuracy at 100% over simulated benchmark data and outperforms baseline methods. Additionally, two last examples apply to image data reaching G-mean up from 96 to 100% (Sensitivity: 92-100% and Specificity: 100%). The proposed method can be researched and used to understand the internal structures of big data in the digital age through the probability density functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.