Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090196›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Using olfactory cues in text materials benefits delayed retention and schemata construction.

Wenhao Li, Li Qian, Qinna Feng, Heng Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenhao LiFaculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, 152 Luoyu Street, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Li QianFaculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, 152 Luoyu Street, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Qinna FengFaculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, 152 Luoyu Street, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Heng LuoFaculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, 152 Luoyu Street, Wuhan, 430079, China. luoheng@ccnu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2024CXZZ045National Teacher Development Cooperative Innovation Experimental Base CCNUTEIII 2024-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory cues are considered a new sensory medium that can enhance learning, but the lack of empirical data has hampered their widespread use in educational practice. This requires empirical research to explore the effects of olfactory cues on learning. To address this research need, an experimental research study was conducted among 87 fourth graders from a Chinese elementary school. It explored the innovative design of adding olfactory cues to text materials by examining their effects on retention and schemata construction as learning outcomes, as well as their influence on learners' cognitive load and learning experience. In this between-subjects design experiment, the experimental group (n = 44) learned text materials with the introduction of olfactory cues, while the control group (n = 43) only learned text materials. After the learning activity, participants were asked to complete the questionnaires, immediate test, and delayed test. The results revealed that the usage of olfactory cues synchronized with text materials can enhance delayed retention, facilitate schemata construction, and improve learner experience without increasing cognitive load. This study confirms the potential of well-designed olfactory cues in educational practice and provides insights for designing and presenting multimedia learning resources.

Indexed as

CuesChildFemaleHumansLearningMaleSmellDelayed retentionExperimental researchOlfactory cuesSchemata construction

Identifiers

PMID39090196
PMCPMC11294454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.