ArticleScientific reports2024
iEat: automatic wearable dietary monitoring with bio-impedance sensing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Nutritional Ingestive Behavior Microstructure Detection: Video Annotation and Passive Sensing Approaches.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Support Dietetic Practice Across Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Multiple physiological and behavioural parameters identification for dietary monitoring using wearable sensors: a study protocol.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- Observational
- Exploring Bio-Impedance Sensing for Intelligent Wearable Devices.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diet is an inseparable part of good health, from maintaining a healthy lifestyle for the general population to supporting the treatment of patients suffering from specific diseases. Therefore it is of great significance to be able to monitor people's dietary activity in their daily life remotely. While the traditional practices of self-reporting and retrospective analysis are often unreliable and prone to errors; sensor-based remote diet monitoring is therefore an appealing approach. In this work, we explore an atypical use of bio-impedance by leveraging its unique temporal signal patterns, which are caused by the dynamic close-loop circuit variation between a pair of electrodes due to the body-food interactions during dining activities. Specifically, we introduce iEat, a wearable impedance-sensing device for automatic dietary activity monitoring without the need for external instrumented devices such as smart utensils. By deploying a single impedance sensing channel with one electrode on each wrist, iEat can recognize food intake activities (e.g., cutting, putting food in the mouth with or without utensils, drinking, etc.) and food types from a defined category. The principle is that, at idle, iEat measures only the normal body impedance between the wrist-worn electrodes; while the subject is doing the food-intake activities, new paralleled circuits will be formed through the hand, mouth, utensils, and food, leading to consequential impedance variation. To quantitatively evaluate iEat in real-life settings, a food intake experiment was conducted in an everyday table-dining environment, including 40 meals performed by ten volunteers. With a lightweight, user-independent neural network model, iEat could detect four food intake-related activities with a macro F1 score of 86.4% and classify seven types of foods with a macro F1 score of 64.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.