ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting mine water inflow volumes using a decomposition-optimization algorithm-machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forecasting Renewable energy and electricity consumption using evolutionary hyperheuristic algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction and application of optimized model for mine water inflow prediction based on neural network and ARIMA model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disasters caused by mine water inflows significantly threaten the safety of coal mining operations. Deep mining complicates the acquisition of hydrogeological parameters, the mechanics of water inrush, and the prediction of sudden changes in mine water inflow. Traditional models and singular machine learning approaches often fail to accurately forecast abrupt shifts in mine water inflows. This study introduces a novel coupled decomposition-optimization-deep learning model that integrates Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN), Northern Goshawk Optimization (NGO), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. We evaluate three types of mine water inflow forecasting methods: a singular time series prediction model, a decomposition-prediction coupled model, and a decomposition-optimization-prediction coupled model, assessing their ability to capture sudden changes in data trends and their prediction accuracy. Results show that the singular prediction model is optimal with a sliding input step of 3 and a maximum of 400 epochs. Compared to the CEEMDAN-LSTM model, the CEEMDAN-NGO-LSTM model demonstrates superior performance in predicting local extreme shifts in mine water inflow volumes. Specifically, the CEEMDAN-NGO-LSTM model achieves scores of 96.578 in MAE, 1.471% in MAPE, 122.143 in RMSE, and 0.958 in NSE, representing average performance improvements of 44.950% and 19.400% over the LSTM model and CEEMDAN-LSTM model, respectively. Additionally, this model provides the most accurate predictions of mine water inflow volumes over the next five days. Therefore, the decomposition-optimization-prediction coupled model presents a novel technical solution for the safety monitoring of smart mines, offering significant theoretical and practical value for ensuring safe mining operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.