ArticleScientific reports2024
Forecasting rheumatoid arthritis patient arrivals by including meteorological factors and air pollutants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has gradually elevated, increasing the need for medical resource redistribution. Forecasting RA patient arrivals can be helpful in managing medical resources. However, no relevant studies have been conducted yet. This study aims to construct a long short-term memory (LSTM) model, a deep learning model recently developed for novel data processing, to forecast RA patient arrivals considering meteorological factors and air pollutants and compares this model with traditional methods. Data on RA patients, meteorological factors and air pollutants from 2015 to 2022 were collected and normalized to construct moving average (MA)- and autoregressive (AR)-based and LSTM models. After data normalization, the root mean square error (RMSE) was adopted to evaluate models' forecast ability. A total of 2422 individuals were enrolled. Not using the environmental data, the RMSEs of the MA- and AR-based models' test sets are 0.131, 0.132, and 0.117 when the training set: test set ratio is 2:1, 3:1, and 7:1, while they are 0.110, 0.130, and 0.112 for the univariate LSTM models. Considering meteorological factors and air pollutants, the RMSEs of the MA- and AR-based model test sets were 0.142, 0.303, and 0.164 when the training set: test set ratio is 2:1, 3:1, and 7:1, while they were 0.108, 0.119, and 0.109 for the multivariable LSTM models. Our study demonstrated that LSTM models can forecast RA patient arrivals more accurately than MA- and AR-based models for datasets of all three sizes. Considering the meteorological factors and air pollutants can further improve the forecasting ability of the LSTM models. This novel method provides valuable information for medical management, the optimization of medical resource redistribution, and the alleviation of resource shortages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.