Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090103›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Reconfiguration of organic electrochemical transistors for high-accuracy potentiometric sensing.

Luca Salvigni, Prem Depan Nayak, Anil Koklu, Danilo Arcangeli, Johana Uribe, Adel Hama, Raphaela Silva, Tania Cecilia Hidalgo Castillo, Sophie Griggs, Adam Marks and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Ion-Exchange-Driven Ternary Organic Neuromorphic Devices with High Efficiency and Stability.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luca SalvigniOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7484-1120
Prem Depan NayakOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2010-044X
Anil KokluOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Danilo ArcangeliOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-0171
Johana UribeOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8546-9611
Adel HamaOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-181X
Raphaela SilvaOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Tania Cecilia Hidalgo CastilloOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-9539
Sophie GriggsUniversity of Oxford, Department of Chemistry, Oxford, UK.
Adam MarksUniversity of Oxford, Department of Chemistry, Oxford, UK.
Iain McCullochUniversity of Oxford, Department of Chemistry, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6340-7217
Sahika InalOrganic Bioelectronics Laboratory, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. sahika.inal@kaust.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1166-1512

Funding

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) ORA-2021-CRG10-4650King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) REI/1/5130-01-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic electrochemical transistors have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional 2/3 electrode setups for sensing applications, offering in-situ transduction, electrochemical amplification, and noise reduction. Several of these devices are designed to detect potentiometric-derived signals. However, potentiometric sensing should be performed under open circuit potential conditions, allowing the system to reach thermodynamic equilibrium. This criterion is not met by conventional organic electrochemical transistors, where voltages or currents are directly applied to the sensing interface, that is, the gate electrode. In this work, we introduce an organic electrochemical transistor sensing configuration called the potentiometric‑OECT (pOECT), which maintains the sensing electrode under open circuit potential conditions. The pOECT exhibits a higher response than the 2-electrode setup and offers greater accuracy, response, and stability compared to conventional organic electrochemical transistors. Additionally, it allows for the implementation of high-impedance electrodes as gate/sensing surfaces, all without compromising the overall device size.

Identifiers

PMID39090103
PMCPMC11294360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.