Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090091›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Neural representational geometries reflect behavioral differences in monkeys and recurrent neural networks.

Valeria Fascianelli, Aldo Battista, Fabio Stefanini, Satoshi Tsujimoto, Aldo Genovesio, Stefano Fusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transformations of the spatial activity manifold convey aversive information in CA3.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. The cost of efficiency in flexible neural representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive pursuit emerges in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The geometry of context-dependent biased decisions during learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valeria FascianelliCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. vf2266@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-5984
Aldo BattistaCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1018-0247
Fabio StefaniniCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Satoshi TsujimotoSixthFactor Pte. Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Aldo GenovesioDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. aldo.genovesio@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-143X
Stefano FusiCenter for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. sf2237@columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3035-6652

Funding

Gatsby Charitable Foundation GAT3708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals likely use a variety of strategies to solve laboratory tasks. Traditionally, combined analysis of behavioral and neural recording data across subjects employing different strategies may obscure important signals and give confusing results. Hence, it is essential to develop techniques that can infer strategy at the single-subject level. We analyzed an experiment in which two male monkeys performed a visually cued rule-based task. The analysis of their performance shows no indication that they used a different strategy. However, when we examined the geometry of stimulus representations in the state space of the neural activities recorded in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, we found striking differences between the two monkeys. Our purely neural results induced us to reanalyze the behavior. The new analysis showed that the differences in representational geometry are associated with differences in the reaction times, revealing behavioral differences we were unaware of. All these analyses suggest that the monkeys are using different strategies. Finally, using recurrent neural network models trained to perform the same task, we show that these strategies correlate with the amount of training, suggesting a possible explanation for the observed neural and behavioral differences.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMacaca mulattaPrefrontal CortexAnimalsCuesMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID39090091
PMCPMC11294567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.