Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39090084›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Flexible gating between subspaces in a neural network model of internally guided task switching.

Yue Liu, Xiao-Jing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recurrent neural network dynamical systems for biological vision.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yue LiuCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Xiao-Jing WangCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. xjwang@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-8474

Funding

Recurrent Neual Circuit Basis of Time Integration and Decision MakingR01MH062349 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, XIAO-JING · 2001 to 2022
$7.2M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Inc.) R01MH062349NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062349United States Department of Defense | United States Navy | Office of Naval Research (ONR) N00014-23-1-2040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral flexibility relies on the brain's ability to switch rapidly between multiple tasks, even when the task rule is not explicitly cued but must be inferred through trial and error. The underlying neural circuit mechanism remains poorly understood. We investigated recurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained to perform an analog of the classic Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The networks consist of two modules responsible for rule representation and sensorimotor mapping, respectively, where each module is comprised of a circuit with excitatory neurons and three major types of inhibitory neurons. We found that rule representation by self-sustained persistent activity across trials, error monitoring and gated sensorimotor mapping emerged from training. Systematic dissection of trained RNNs revealed a detailed circuit mechanism that is consistent across networks trained with different hyperparameters. The networks' dynamical trajectories for different rules resided in separate subspaces of population activity; the subspaces collapsed and performance was reduced to chance level when dendrite-targeting somatostatin-expressing interneurons were silenced, illustrating how a phenomenological description of representational subspaces is explained by a specific circuit mechanism.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBrainHumansInterneuronsNerve NetNeurons

Identifiers

PMID39090084
PMCPMC11294624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.