Trial reportJournal of hepatology2025
Outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the phase III randomised HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Trial report in Journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03298451 (A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of therapies for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- A bibliometric and visual analysis based on immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2014 - 2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- HILL: the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with the FOLFOX regimen combined with lenvatinib and the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Trial
- Phase 2 study of serplulimab with the bevacizumab biosimilar HLX04 in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Trial
- Intratumoral delivery of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors for recurrent/refractory solid tumors: a proof-of-concept treatment strategy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- Optimal treatment selection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Evolving Landscape of Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Targeted Therapy and Combination Strategies to Emerging Therapies.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Lenvatinib or Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CheckMate 9DW Japanese Subgroup Analysis.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Over Three Decades: from Screening Evolution to Integrated Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of cancer prevention · 2026Review
- Discordance between vibration controlled-transient elastography and ultrasound in cirrhosis assessment: prognostic implications for liver-related events in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- The Use of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor in the Treatment of Giant Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Engineered Akkermansia muciniphila vesicles for targeted pyroptosis and trained immunity to enhance immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Chemoresistance in the era of immunotherapy: challenges and novel combinatorial strategies for digestive system tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Eastern World: Screening, Diagnosis, Staging and Treatment.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Gustave Roussy Immune Score Predicts Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with TACE and Immunotherapy.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Advances in Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Commentary on The Impact of the STRIDE Regimen in HIMALAYA Trial.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsIn the global, phase III HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib; durvalumab was non-inferior to sorafenib. HBV is the predominant HCC aetiology in most of Asia vs. HCV or non-viral aetiologies in Western countries and Japan. This analysis evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes for STRIDE and durvalumab monotherapy vs. sorafenib, in HIMALAYA participants enrolled in Asia, excluding Japan.
methodsIn HIMALAYA, participants were randomised to STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. The Asian subgroup in this analysis included participants enrolled in Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. OS, objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST, version 1.1), and safety were assessed in the Asian subgroup and in an exploratory subgroup of participants in Hong Kong and Taiwan.
resultsThe Asian subgroup included 479 participants randomised to STRIDE (n = 156), durvalumab (n = 167), or sorafenib (n = 156). OS was improved for STRIDE vs. sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89). The OS HR for durvalumab vs. sorafenib was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.06). In Hong Kong and Taiwan (n = 141), OS HRs for STRIDE vs. sorafenib and durvalumab vs. sorafenib were 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-1.08), respectively. In the Asian subgroup, ORR (including unconfirmed responses) was numerically higher for STRIDE (28.2%) and durvalumab (18.6%) vs. sorafenib (9.0%), and Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were numerically lower for STRIDE (19.9%) and durvalumab (13.3%) vs. sorafenib (30.5%).
conclusionsSTRIDE improved outcomes vs. sorafenib in the Asian subgroup. These results support the benefits of STRIDE for participants with uHCC globally, including in the Asia-Pacific region. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03298451. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: The global, phase III HIMALAYA study found that the STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen improved overall survival (OS), including long-term OS vs. sorafenib, and that durvalumab monotherapy was non-inferior to sorafenib in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are differences in the aetiology and clinical practices related to HCC in parts of Asia, compared to Western countries and Japan, which could lead to differences in treatment outcomes between these regions. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefits of STRIDE for participants in the Asia-Pacific region, consistent with the full, global study population. Overall, these findings continue to support the use of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39089633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.