Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39089606›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2024

Just a number? Donor age and (lack of) associated reasons for heart offer refusal.

Aprotim C Bhowmik, Brian Wayda, Helen Luikart, Yingjie Weng, Shiqi Zhang, R Patrick Wood, Javier Nieto, Tahnee Groat, Nikole Neidlinger, Jonathan Zaroff and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aprotim C BhowmikZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
Brian WaydaCardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Helen LuikartCardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Yingjie WengQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Shiqi ZhangQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
R Patrick WoodLife Gift Organ Procurement Organization, Houston, Texas.
Javier NietoLife Gift Organ Procurement Organization, Houston, Texas.
Tahnee GroatTrauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Nikole NeidlingerSurgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jonathan ZaroffDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
Darren MalinoskiTrauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Kiran K KhushCardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California. Electronic address: kiran@stanford.edu.

Funding

Evidence Based Evaluation and Acceptance of Donor Hearts for TransplantationR01HL125303 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KHUSH, KIRAN KAUR · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of 50+ year-old donors for heart transplant (HT) is rare in the United States. We assessed reasons for this-and whether it reflects concern about age itself or associated risk factors-using a survey of US HT centers. The Donor Heart Study enrolled US adult potential heart donors from 2015 to 2020. A total of 6,814 surveys across 2,197 donors cited, on average, 2.4 reasons (per donor) for offer refusal. Age was cited often (by ≥50% of centers surveyed) for 715 donors (33%). In this subgroup, accompanying donor-related reasons for refusal were infrequent, with no cardiac abnormality cited in most cases. Donor age showed associations with (1) age as a reason for refusal and (2) discard. Both abruptly increased at age 50: 55% of 50 to 51-year-old donors were refused often due to age (vs 38% of 48-49-year-olds), and 72% were discarded (vs 55% of 48-49-year-olds), despite no evidence of a threshold effect of age on outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationTissue DonorsAdultAgedAge FactorsDonor SelectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTissue and Organ ProcurementTreatment RefusalUnited Statesdonor agedonor heart utilizationheart offer refusalheart transplantationthreshold age

Identifiers

PMID39089606
PMCPMC11532008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.