Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39089217›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2024

Crime-related perceptions and walking for recreation inside and outside one's home neighborhood.

Caterina G Roman, Ruohui Chen, Loki Natarajan, Terry L Conway, Christina Patch, Ralph B Taylor, Kelli L Cain, Scott Roesch, Marc A Adams, Brian E Saelens and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caterina G RomanDepartment of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: croman@temple.edu.
Ruohui ChenFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine - Biostatistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Loki NatarajanHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health & Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Terry L ConwayHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health & Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Christina PatchCentral Valley Community Foundation, Fresno, CA, USA.
Ralph B TaylorDepartment of Criminal Justice, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kelli L CainHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health & Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Scott RoeschDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA.
Marc A AdamsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Brian E SaelensDepartments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Washington, USA.
Abby C KingStanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University California, USA.
Lawrence D FrankDepartment of Urban Studies and Planning, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Karen GlanzPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, USA and School of Nursing, USA.
James F SallisHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health & Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

CRIME-PA: CRIme Measures Evaluations for Physical ActivityR01HL117884 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SALLIS, JAMES F. · 2013 to 2016
$2.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely assumed crime and related concerns, including neighborhood incivilities and fear of crime, are barriers to physical activity (PA). Past studies reveal mixed evidence. Studies of impacts for crime-protective factors are less common but have similarly mixed results. This paper evaluates a comprehensive transdisciplinary conceptual framework of cross-sectional associations between crime-related perceptions and reported minutes/week of recreational walking inside and outside one's home neighborhood. Safe and Fit Environments Study (SAFE) recruited and surveyed 2302 participants from adolescents to older adults from four U.S. metropolitan areas. A zero-inflated model estimated two components of each outcome: whether the respondent walked, and minutes/week walked. Correlates of recreational walking were location-specific, differing based on walking location. Fear of crime, risk evaluation, victimization, and incivilities were not consistently associated with walking for recreation inside one's neighborhood. People with crime concerns about their own neighborhoods, however, more commonly walked for recreation outside their neighborhoods. Protective crime-related perceptions that seldom have been studied in relation to PA, such as street efficacy (i.e., the perceived ability to avoid and manage danger), were strongly associated with recreational walking in both locations, indicating the additional heuristic value of the SAFE conceptual framework. Crime-related perceptions and walking for recreation: Evaluating a conceptual model.

Indexed as

CrimeRecreationResidence CharacteristicsWalkingAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesExerciseFear of crimePerceptions of crimePhysical activityPublic healthSafety

Identifiers

PMID39089217
PMCPMC11402571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.