Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088984›Full record

Observational studyESMO open2024

Estimating the prevalence of mental disorders in patients with newly diagnosed cancer in relation to socioeconomic status: a multicenter prospective observational study.

U Goerling, J Ernst, P Esser, C Haering, M Hermann, B Hornemann, P Hövel, U Keilholz, D Kissane, O von dem Knesebeck and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Initial assessments by psycho-oncologists: predictors of distress and support needs.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

U GoerlingCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin.
J ErnstDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig.
P EsserDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig.
C HaeringComprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
M HermannCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin.
B HornemannComprehensive Cancer Center, University Clinic Centre Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
P HövelDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig.
U KeilholzCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Berlin.
D KissaneSchool of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney; Departments of Palliative Care, Cabrini Health, Melbourne; Department of Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney; School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
O von dem KnesebeckInstitute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
F LordickDepartment of Medicine II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Pulmonology), Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig.
F SpringerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig.
H ZinglerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover.
T ZimmermannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover.
C EngelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
A Mehnert-TheuerkaufDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig. Electronic address: anja.mehnert@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to provide the 4-week prevalence estimates of mental disorders in newly diagnosed cancer patients in relation to socioeconomic status (SES). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe enrolled newly diagnosed patients with a confirmed solid tumor within 2 months of diagnosis. We calculated patients' SES on the basis of their educational level, professional qualification, income and occupational status. We used the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition-Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV) to assess the 4-week prevalence of mental disorders in addition to a comorbidity questionnaire to assess the level of physical impairment.

resultsWe identified a total of 1702 patients with mixed cancers after reviewing their medical records and contacting them in person or by post due to coronavirus pandemic patient safety restrictions. 1030 patients (53.2% men, mean age 60.2 years) had completed SCID-5-CV. When weighted according to the SES distribution to account for over- and under-sampling of SES groups, 20.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.1% to 23.6%] of patients were diagnosed with any mental disorder. The most prevalent were depressive disorders (9.9%, 95% CI 7.9% to 11.9%), trauma and stress-related disorders (6.3%, 95% CI 4.7% to 7.9%) and anxiety disorders (4.2%, 95% CI 2.9% to 5.6%). We found no difference in any mental disorder between patients with high, medium or low SES. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed higher proportion of patients with any mental disorder in patients younger than 60 years [odds ratio (OR) 0.42; P < 0.001], in patients without a partner (OR 1.84; P < 0.001), in women with tumor in female genital organs (OR 2.45; P < 0.002) and in those with a higher level of impairment (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07; P < 0.001).

conclusionsSES had no significant influence on mental comorbidity in early cancer survivorship.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNeoplasmsSocial ClassAdultAgedComorbidityCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective Studiesquality of lifesupportive caresymptom management

Identifiers

PMID39088984
PMCPMC11345380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.