ArticleAIDS care2024
Who wants long-Acting injectable antiretroviral therapy? Treatment preferences among adults with HIV in Florida.
Article in AIDS care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Willingness to switch to long-acting regimens among people with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Factors Associated With Preference for Long-Acting Injectable Versus Daily Oral Antiretroviral Therapy Among People With HIV: Findings From the SELIGO Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- Receipt of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy among people with HIV in Southern US states: an assessment using electronic health records and claims data.AIDS research and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART) is available to people with HIV (PWH), but it is unknown which PWH prefer this option. Using the Andersen Behavioral Model this study identifies characteristics of PWH with greater preference for LAI ART. Cross-sectional data from the Florida Cohort, which enrolled adult PWH from community-based clinics included information on predisposing (demographics), enabling (transportation, income), and need (ART adherence <90%) factors. ART preference was assessed via a single question (prefer pills, quarterly LAI, or no preference). Confounder-adjusted multinomial logistic regressions compared those who preferred pills to the other preference options, with covariates identified using directed acyclic graphs. Overall, 314 participants responded (40% non-Hispanic Black, 62% assigned male, 63% aged 50+). Most (63%) preferred the hypothetical LAI, 23% preferred pills, and 14% had no preference. PWH with access to a car (aRRR 1.97 95%CI 1.05-3.71), higher income (aRRR 2.55 95%CI 1.04-6.25), and suboptimal ART adherence (aRRR 7.41 95% CI 1.52-36.23) were more likely to prefer the LAI, while those who reported having no social network were less likely to prefer the LAI (aRRR 0.32 95% CI 0.11-0.88). Overall LAI interest was high, with greater preference associated with enabling and need factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.