Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088730›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin2025

Measuring Cognitive Impairments Associated With Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice: Overview of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.

Keith H Nuechterlein, Henry Nasrallah, Dawn Velligan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding the burden of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: Results from the international LUCIA study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MicroRNAs as biomarkers and molecular mediators of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validation and normative data for the BAC app in Spanish-speaking individuals with psychosis and healthy controls.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keith H NuechterleinDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Henry NasrallahDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
Dawn VelliganDivision of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) negatively impacts daily functioning, quality of life, and recovery, yet effective pharmacotherapies and practical assessments for clinical practice are lacking. Despite the pivotal progress made with establishment of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for clinical research, implementation of the full MCCB is too time-consuming and cost-ineffective for most clinicians in clinical practice. STUDY

designHere we discuss current assessments in relation to delivery format (interview-based and performance-based), validity, ease of use for clinicians and patients, reliability/reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for clinical implementation. Key challenges and future opportunities for improving cognitive assessments are also presented. STUDY

resultsCurrent assessments that require 30 min to complete would have value in clinical settings, but the associated staff training and time required might preclude their application in most clinical settings. Initial profiling of cognitive deficits may require about 30 min to assist in the selection of evidence-based treatments; follow-up monitoring with brief assessments (10-15 min in duration) to detect treatment-related effects on global cognition may complement this approach. Guidance on validated brief cognitive tests for the strategic monitoring of treatment effects on CIAS is necessary.

conclusionsWith increased advancements in technology-based and remote assessments, development of validated formats of remote and in-person assessment, and the necessary training models and infrastructure required for implementation, are likely to be of increasing clinical relevance for future clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionNeuropsychological TestsSchizophreniaHumansReproducibility of Resultsbrief cognitive assessmentclinician trainingcost-effective cognitive assessmentinterview-based assessmentperformance-based assessment

Identifiers

PMID39088730
PMCPMC11997797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.