Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088561›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Critical factors for precise and efficient RNA cleavage by RNase Y in Staphylococcus aureus.

Alexandre Le Scornet, Ambre Jousselin, Kamila Baumas, Gergana Kostova, Sylvain Durand, Leonora Poljak, Roland Barriot, Eve Coutant, Romain Pigearias, Gabriel Tejero and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alexandre Le ScornetLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7572-077X
Ambre JousselinLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-5426
Kamila BaumasLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7493-1166
Gergana KostovaUMR8261 CNRS, Université Paris Cité, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.
Sylvain DurandUMR8261 CNRS, Université Paris Cité, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.
Leonora PoljakLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2384-556X
Roland BarriotLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0298-2696
Eve CoutantLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Romain PigeariasLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Gabriel TejeroLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6481-569X
Jonas LootvoetLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Céline PéllisierLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Gladys MunozLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Ciarán CondonUMR8261 CNRS, Université Paris Cité, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-9621
Peter RedderLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires (LMGM), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3619-632X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular processes require precise and specific gene regulation, in which continuous mRNA degradation is a major element. The mRNA degradation mechanisms should be able to degrade a wide range of different RNA substrates with high efficiency, but should at the same time be limited, to avoid killing the cell by elimination of all cellular RNA. RNase Y is a major endoribonuclease found in most Firmicutes, including Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. However, the molecular interactions that direct RNase Y to cleave the correct RNA molecules at the correct position remain unknown. In this work we have identified transcripts that are homologs in S. aureus and B. subtilis, and are RNase Y targets in both bacteria. Two such transcript pairs were used as models to show a functional overlap between the S. aureus and the B. subtilis RNase Y, which highlighted the importance of the nucleotide sequence of the RNA molecule itself in the RNase Y targeting process. Cleavage efficiency is driven by the primary nucleotide sequence immediately downstream of the cleavage site and base-pairing in a secondary structure a few nucleotides downstream. Cleavage positioning is roughly localised by the downstream secondary structure and fine-tuned by the nucleotide immediately upstream of the cleavage. The identified elements were sufficient for RNase Y-dependent cleavage, since the sequence elements from one of the model transcripts were able to convert an exogenous non-target transcript into a target for RNase Y.

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA CleavageRNA StabilityStaphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceEndoribonucleasesNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, MessengerBacterial ProteinsEndoribonucleasesRNA, BacterialRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID39088561
PMCPMC11321564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.