Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088520›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Evaluating theory of change to improve the functioning of the network for improving quality of care for maternal, newborn and child health.

Albert Dube, Kondwani Mwandira, Kohenour Akter, Fatama Khatun, Seblewengel Lemma, Gloria Seruwagi, QCN Evaluation Group, Yusra Ribhi Shawar, Nehla Djellouli, Charles Mwakwenda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Albert DubeParent and Child Health Initiative Trust (PACHI), Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6392-0475
Kondwani MwandiraParent and Child Health Initiative Trust (PACHI), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kohenour AkterPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-1099
Fatama KhatunPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Seblewengel LemmaLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-3723
Gloria SeruwagiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
QCN Evaluation Group
Yusra Ribhi ShawarBloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Nehla DjellouliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles MwakwendaParent and Child Health Initiative Trust (PACHI), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Mike EnglishCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-0826
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-6552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017, WHO and global partners launched 'The Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health' (QCN) seeking to reduce in-facility maternal and newborn deaths and stillbirth by 50% in health facilities by 2022. We explored how the QCN theory of change guided what actually happened over 2018-2022 in order to understand what worked well, what did not, and to ultimately describe the consequences of QCN activities. We applied theory of change analysis criteria to investigate how well-defined, plausible, coherent and measurable the results were, how well-defined, coherent, justifiable, realistic, sustainable and measurable the assumptions were, and how independent and sufficient the causal links were. We found that the QCN theory of change was not used in the same way across implementing countries. While the theory stipulated Leadership, Action, Learning and Accountability as the principle to guide network activity implementation other principles and varying quality improvement methods have also been used; key conditions were missing at service integration and process levels in the global theory of change for the network. Conditions such as lack of physical resources were frequently reported to be preventing adequate care, or harm patient satisfaction. Key partners and implementers were not introduced to the network theory of change early enough for them to raise critical questions about their roles and the need for, and nature of, quality of care interventions. Whilst the theory of change was created at the outset of QCN it is not clear how much it guided actual activities or any monitoring and evaluation as things progressed. Enabling countries to develop their theory of change, perhaps guided by the global framework, could improve stakeholder engagement, allow local evaluation of assumptions and addressing of challenges, and better target QCN work toward achieving its goals.

Identifiers

PMID39088520
PMCPMC11293647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.