Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088394›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Codiscovering graphical structure and functional relationships within data: A Gaussian Process framework for connecting the dots.

Théo Bourdais, Pau Batlle, Xianjin Yang, Ricardo Baptista, Nicolas Rouquette, Houman Owhadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Théo BourdaisComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Pau BatlleComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Xianjin YangComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Ricardo BaptistaComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Nicolas RouquetteJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Houman OwhadiComputing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.ORCID 0000-0002-5677-1600

Funding

DOD | USAF | AMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-20-1-0358DOD | USN | Office of Naval Research (ONR) Vannevar Bush Faculty FellowshipDOE | SC | Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) DE-SC0023163NASA | Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) AIST and JROC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most problems within and beyond the scientific domain can be framed into one of the following three levels of complexity of function approximation. Type 1: Approximate an unknown function given input/output data. Type 2: Consider a collection of variables and functions, some of which are unknown, indexed by the nodes and hyperedges of a hypergraph (a generalized graph where edges can connect more than two vertices). Given partial observations of the variables of the hypergraph (satisfying the functional dependencies imposed by its structure), approximate all the unobserved variables and unknown functions. Type 3: Expanding on Type 2, if the hypergraph structure itself is unknown, use partial observations of the variables of the hypergraph to discover its structure and approximate its unknown functions. These hypergraphs offer a natural platform for organizing, communicating, and processing computational knowledge. While most scientific problems can be framed as the data-driven discovery of unknown functions in a computational hypergraph whose structure is known (Type 2), many require the data-driven discovery of the structure (connectivity) of the hypergraph itself (Type 3). We introduce an interpretable Gaussian Process (GP) framework for such (Type 3) problems that does not require randomization of the data, access to or control over its sampling, or sparsity of the unknown functions in a known or learned basis. Its polynomial complexity, which contrasts sharply with the super-exponential complexity of causal inference methods, is enabled by the nonlinear ANOVA capabilities of GPs used as a sensing mechanism.

Indexed as

Analysis of variancefunctional relationshipsGaussian Processhypergraph discoveryraw data analysis

Identifiers

PMID39088394
PMCPMC11317615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.