Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088392›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Competing adaptations maintain nonadaptive variation in a wild cricket population.

Jack G Rayner, Franca Eichenberger, Jessica V A Bainbridge, Shangzhe Zhang, Xiao Zhang, Leeban H Yusuf, Susan Balenger, Oscar E Gaggiotti, Nathan W Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. EGGS: Empirical Genotype Generalizer for Samples.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Divergent alternative mating tactics in convergent male reproductive morphs.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jack G RaynerDepartment of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740.ORCID 0000-0001-9259-9046
Franca EichenbergerCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3345-4792
Jessica V A BainbridgeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland.
Shangzhe ZhangCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.
Xiao ZhangCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.
Leeban H YusufCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6383-1176
Susan BalengerCollege of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Oscar E GaggiottiCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1827-1493
Nathan W BaileyCentre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, United Kingdom.

Funding

UKRI | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NE/T0006191/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How emerging adaptive variants interact is an important factor in the evolution of wild populations, but the opportunity to empirically study this interaction is rare. We recently documented the emergence of an adaptive phenotype "curly-wing" in Hawaiian populations of field crickets (

Indexed as

GryllidaePhenotypeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleHawaiiMaleWings, AnimaladaptationepistasispolymorphismTeleogryllus oceanicuswild populations

Identifiers

PMID39088392
PMCPMC11317585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.