Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088357›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2025

The 100 highest-cited original articles in large vessel occlusions: A bibliometric analysis.

Ataollah Shahbandi, Matthew Holt, Nathan A Shlobin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ataollah ShahbandiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1042-8580
Matthew HoltDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of South Carolina Beaufort, Bluffton, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1632-7705
Nathan A ShlobinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundLarge vessel occlusions (LVO) are a common etiology of morbidity and mortality. The current literature lacks a synthesis of the landscape and trends in research.ObjectiveWe aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited original articles on LVOs to assess the current state of research.MethodsScopus database was queried from inception to December 2022 to identify the most cited original articles from 4506 retrieved records on LVOs. Publication year, country of origin, total and average annual citation count, and type of study were collected for each article. The journal impact factor (JIF) was obtained from the Journal Citation Reports database.ResultsThe articles were published between 1994 and 2021, with most (

Indexed as

BibliometricsCerebrovascular DisordersHumansJournal Impact FactorPeriodicals as TopicEndovascularlarge arterial occlusionlarge artery occlusionlarge vessel occlusionstrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID39088357
PMCPMC11571783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.