Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088253›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2024

Making Metadata Machine-Readable as the First Step to Providing Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable Population Health Data: Framework Development and Implementation Study.

David Amadi, Sylvia Kiwuwa-Muyingo, Tathagata Bhattacharjee, Amelia Taylor, Agnes Kiragga, Michael Ochola, Chifundo Kanjala, Arofan Gregory, Keith Tomlin, Jim Todd and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David AmadiDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-4439
Sylvia Kiwuwa-MuyingoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-5690
Tathagata BhattacharjeeDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9437-0894
Amelia TaylorMalawi University of Business and Applied Science, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-8721
Agnes KiraggaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-0969-0699
Michael OcholaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-9081-3360
Chifundo KanjalaIndependent researcher, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-8374
Arofan GregoryCommittee on Data (CODATA), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-7659
Keith TomlinDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-5147
Jim ToddDepartment of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-4914
Jay GreenfieldCommittee on Data (CODATA), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-5317

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetadata describe and provide context for other data, playing a pivotal role in enabling findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability (FAIR) data principles. By providing comprehensive and machine-readable descriptions of digital resources, metadata empower both machines and human users to seamlessly discover, access, integrate, and reuse data or content across diverse platforms and applications. However, the limited accessibility and machine-interpretability of existing metadata for population health data hinder effective data discovery and reuse.

objectiveTo address these challenges, we propose a comprehensive framework using standardized formats, vocabularies, and protocols to render population health data machine-readable, significantly enhancing their FAIRness and enabling seamless discovery, access, and integration across diverse platforms and research applications.

methodsThe framework implements a 3-stage approach. The first stage is Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) integration, which involves leveraging the DDI Codebook metadata and documentation of detailed information for data and associated assets, while ensuring transparency and comprehensiveness. The second stage is Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) standardization. In this stage, the data are harmonized and standardized into the OMOP CDM, facilitating unified analysis across heterogeneous data sets. The third stage involves the integration of Schema.org and JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data (JSON-LD), in which machine-readable metadata are generated using Schema.org entities and embedded within the data using JSON-LD, boosting discoverability and comprehension for both machines and human users. We demonstrated the implementation of these 3 stages using the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) data from Malawi and Kenya.

resultsThe implementation of our framework significantly enhanced the FAIRness of population health data, resulting in improved discoverability through seamless integration with platforms such as Google Dataset Search. The adoption of standardized formats and protocols streamlined data accessibility and integration across various research environments, fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing. Additionally, the use of machine-interpretable metadata empowered researchers to efficiently reuse data for targeted analyses and insights, thereby maximizing the overall value of population health resources. The JSON-LD codes are accessible via a GitHub repository and the HTML code integrated with JSON-LD is available on the Implementation Network for Sharing Population Information from Research Entities website.

conclusionsThe adoption of machine-readable metadata standards is essential for ensuring the FAIRness of population health data. By embracing these standards, organizations can enhance diverse resource visibility, accessibility, and utility, leading to a broader impact, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Machine-readable metadata can accelerate research, improve health care decision-making, and ultimately promote better health outcomes for populations worldwide.

Indexed as

Data Documentation Initiativedata modelsdata scienceDDIFAIR data principlesJavaScript Object Notation for Linked DataJSON-LDmachine-readable metadatametadataObservational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data ModelOMOP CDMstandardization

Identifiers

PMID39088253
PMCPMC11327634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.