Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088200›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2024

Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated AI Tool to Estimate Gestational Age From Blind Ultrasound Sweeps.

Jeffrey S A Stringer, Teeranan Pokaprakarn, Juan C Prieto, Bellington Vwalika, Srihari V Chari, Ntazana Sindano, Bethany L Freeman, Bridget Sikapande, Nicole M Davis, Yuri V Sebastião and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05433519 (Z 32104 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05433519 completednot on this map

Z 32104 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2022 to 2023Enrolled400ConditionsGestational Age, Machine Learning, Pregnancy Related
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Real-time gestational-age estimation at 11-13 weeks using artificial intelligence on non-targeted ultrasound sweeps.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Democratizing cancer detection: artificial intelligence-enhanced endoscopy could address global disparities in head and neck cancer outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jeffrey S A StringerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Teeranan PokaprakarnDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.
Juan C PrietoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Bellington VwalikaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Srihari V ChariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Ntazana SindanoUNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Bethany L FreemanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Bridget SikapandeUNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nicole M DavisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Yuri V SebastiãoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Nelly M MandonaUNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Elizabeth M StringerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Chiraz BenabdelkaderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Mutinta MungoleUNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Filson M KapilyaUNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nariman AlmniniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Arieska N DiazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Brittany A FecteauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Michael R KosorokDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.
Stephen R ColeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.
Margaret P KasaroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) is essential to good pregnancy care but often requires ultrasonography, which may not be available in low-resource settings. This study developed a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate GA from blind ultrasonography sweeps and incorporated it into the software of a low-cost, battery-powered device. Objective: To evaluate GA estimation accuracy of an AI-enabled ultrasonography tool when used by novice users with no prior training in sonography. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 400 individuals with viable, single, nonanomalous, first-trimester pregnancies in Lusaka, Zambia, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Credentialed sonographers established the "ground truth" GA via transvaginal crown-rump length measurement. At random follow-up visits throughout gestation, including a primary evaluation window from 14 0/7 weeks' to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation, novice users obtained blind sweeps of the maternal abdomen using the AI-enabled device (index test) and credentialed sonographers performed fetal biometry with a high-specification machine (study standard). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean absolute error (MAE) of the index test and study standard, which was calculated by comparing each method's estimate to the previously established GA and considered equivalent if the difference fell within a prespecified margin of ±2 days. Results: In the primary evaluation window, the AI-enabled device met criteria for equivalence to the study standard, with an MAE (SE) of 3.2 (0.1) days vs 3.0 (0.1) days (difference, 0.2 days [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.5]). Additionally, the percentage of assessments within 7 days of the ground truth GA was comparable (90.7% for the index test vs 92.5% for the study standard). Performance was consistent in prespecified subgroups, including the Zambia and North Carolina cohorts and those with high body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: Between 14 and 27 weeks' gestation, novice users with no prior training in ultrasonography estimated GA as accurately with the low-cost, point-of-care AI tool as credentialed sonographers performing standard biometry on high-specification machines. These findings have immediate implications for obstetrical care in low-resource settings, advancing the World Health Organization goal of ultrasonography estimation of GA for all pregnant people. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05433519.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGestational AgeUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultBiometryCrown-Rump LengthFemaleHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProspective StudiesSoftwareZambia

Identifiers

PMID39088200
PMCPMC11350478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.