Observational studyJAMA2024
Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated AI Tool to Estimate Gestational Age From Blind Ultrasound Sweeps.
Observational study in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05433519 (Z 32104 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Z 32104 - Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Gestational Age
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time gestational-age estimation at 11-13 weeks using artificial intelligence on non-targeted ultrasound sweeps.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Observational
- Representativeness of Study Population: A Critical Consideration for Applying Gestational Age Estimation Models.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
- The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Generalization of AI-Based Gestational Age Assessment Using Blind Sweep Ultrasonography.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A Decade of Evolution in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature (2015-2025): A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis From a Leading Specialty Journal Perspective.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Improving structural heart disease screening: AI-ECG and novice AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A tale of two cities: global inequities at the limits of neonatal survival.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- AI in Childbirth and Emerging Alternatives to Traditional Fertility Treatments.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- The application of artificial intelligence in blind ultrasound sweep diagnostics for prenatal medicine: A systematic literature review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- AI-assisted point of care ultrasound and an innovative vaginal speculum: a proposed combined approach to reducing spontaneous preterm birth.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Automated artificial intelligence-enabled measurement of cardiac structures on point-of-care ultrasonography: a prospective multicenter validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Association of relative expression of HSD11B-1 and HSD11B-2 with pregnancy status in sheep.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Deep learning approach for screening neonatal cerebral lesions on ultrasound in China.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The performance of sonographic antenatal birth weight assessment assisted with artificial intelligence compared to that of manual examiners at term.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- The economics of investing in women and health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- AI-enabled obstetric point-of-care ultrasound as an emerging technology in low- and middle-income countries: provider and health system perspectives.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Born too soon: global epidemiology of preterm birth and drivers for change.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Democratizing cancer detection: artificial intelligence-enhanced endoscopy could address global disparities in head and neck cancer outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Growth Restriction Management: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Accurate assessment of gestational age (GA) is essential to good pregnancy care but often requires ultrasonography, which may not be available in low-resource settings. This study developed a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate GA from blind ultrasonography sweeps and incorporated it into the software of a low-cost, battery-powered device. Objective: To evaluate GA estimation accuracy of an AI-enabled ultrasonography tool when used by novice users with no prior training in sonography. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 400 individuals with viable, single, nonanomalous, first-trimester pregnancies in Lusaka, Zambia, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Credentialed sonographers established the "ground truth" GA via transvaginal crown-rump length measurement. At random follow-up visits throughout gestation, including a primary evaluation window from 14 0/7 weeks' to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation, novice users obtained blind sweeps of the maternal abdomen using the AI-enabled device (index test) and credentialed sonographers performed fetal biometry with a high-specification machine (study standard). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean absolute error (MAE) of the index test and study standard, which was calculated by comparing each method's estimate to the previously established GA and considered equivalent if the difference fell within a prespecified margin of ±2 days. Results: In the primary evaluation window, the AI-enabled device met criteria for equivalence to the study standard, with an MAE (SE) of 3.2 (0.1) days vs 3.0 (0.1) days (difference, 0.2 days [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.5]). Additionally, the percentage of assessments within 7 days of the ground truth GA was comparable (90.7% for the index test vs 92.5% for the study standard). Performance was consistent in prespecified subgroups, including the Zambia and North Carolina cohorts and those with high body mass index. Conclusions and Relevance: Between 14 and 27 weeks' gestation, novice users with no prior training in ultrasonography estimated GA as accurately with the low-cost, point-of-care AI tool as credentialed sonographers performing standard biometry on high-specification machines. These findings have immediate implications for obstetrical care in low-resource settings, advancing the World Health Organization goal of ultrasonography estimation of GA for all pregnant people. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05433519.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.