Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088184›Full record

Trial reportDrugs in R&D2024

Bioequivalence and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Orodispersible Tablets and Conventional Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.

Manuel Román, Dolores Ochoa, Samuel Martin, Sergio Luquero, Inmaculada Gilaberte, Paula Arranz, Carlos Sánchez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs in R&D, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuel RománClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), C/ Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Dolores OchoaClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), C/ Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Samuel MartinClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), C/ Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio LuqueroClinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), C/ Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada GilaberteDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA S. A., C. Vía de los Poblados 3, 28033, Madrid, Spain.
Paula ArranzDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA S. A., C. Vía de los Poblados 3, 28033, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos SánchezDepartment of Research, Development and Innovation, FAES FARMA S. A., C. Vía de los Poblados 3, 28033, Madrid, Spain. csanchez@faes.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2456-4651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveOrodispersible tablets (ODT) rapidly dissolve in the oral cavity and can improve patient's convenience. This pharmacokinetic study assessed the bioequivalence of a novel 20 mg ODT formulation of bilastine compared with bilastine 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

methodsA phase I, single-center, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover randomized clinical trial was conducted. The study comprised two periods, in which participants were administered a single oral dose of bilastine 20 mg in the form of ODT as the test product, or conventional tablets as the reference product, and a washout of 7 days between each period. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 h. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals of the C

resultsA total of 42 healthy volunteers were randomized, and 41 completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for both formulations after a single dose of 20 mg. Bilastine ODT and conventional tablets were bioequivalent as the 90% confidence intervals of the test over reference ratios were within the predefined range (80-125%). Both formulations were well tolerated and showed a similar safety profile.

conclusionsBilastine ODT was bioequivalent to the reference treatment formulated as conventional tablets when administered as a single oral dose of 20 mg under fasting conditions. Both formulations showed a similar tolerability and safety profile, with no serious adverse events or significant analytical alterations reported.

trial registration2019-004071-39. Date of authorization: 10 December 2019.

Indexed as

Cross-Over StudiesFastingHealthy VolunteersTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyAdministration, OralAdultArea Under CurveBenzimidazolesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesYoung AdultBenzimidazolesbilastinePiperidinesTablets

Identifiers

PMID39088184
PMCPMC11456049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.