Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088161›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024

An exploration of fibre intake and bowel function in a sample of adults at an Irish university campus.

Ellen Lynch, Sophie Mulligan, Suzanne L Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ellen LynchSchool of Biological, Health and Sports Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 XT95, Ireland.
Sophie MulliganSchool of Biological, Health and Sports Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 XT95, Ireland.
Suzanne L DoyleSchool of Biological, Health and Sports Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 XT95, Ireland. suzanne.doyle@tudublin.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-0446

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBowel dysfunction can significantly impair quality of life. Adequate fibre intake is associated with good bowel health but intakes have been reported to be low in Ireland.

aimThis study aimed to gather data on fibre intake and bowel habits in a cohort of adults at a university campus in Dublin, Ireland.

methodsAn online questionnaire was developed by adapting validated tools to assess habitual fibre intake and bowel function. The questionnaire was circulated through mailing lists and advertised via QR codes on campus in February/March 2023. Data was analysed using SPSS, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsIn total, 275 valid responses were received. Low fibre intakes (< 19 g/day) were found in 50.5% of participants. A significantly higher proportion of males had low fibre intake compared to females (62.2% vs 44.8%, p = 0.039). Nearly a third (30.2%) of respondents experienced mild symptoms of bowel dysfunction, and 13.1% experienced moderate to severe symptoms. An inverse relationship was observed between fibre intake (g/day) and bowel dysfunction (p = 0.033).

conclusionsIn this cohort, low fibre intakes and some degree of bowel dysfunction were prevalent. Public health campaigns to increase fibre intake could prove to be a cost-effective way to improve bowel function and health amongst adults in Ireland.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberAdultConstipationFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultDietary FiberBowel dysfunctionConstipationFibreIrritable bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39088161
PMCPMC11666678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.