Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088159›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2025

Interpretation of acid-base metabolism on arterial blood gas samples via machine learning algorithms.

Habib Ozdemir, Muhammed Ikbal Sasmaz, Ramazan Guven, Akkan Avci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Habib OzdemirHealth Data Research and Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute, Health Institutes of Turkiye, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-7233
Muhammed Ikbal SasmazFaculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3267-3184
Ramazan GuvenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Research and Training Hospital, Health Science University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4129-8985
Akkan AvciDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Health Science University, Adana, 01060, Türkiye. drakkanavci@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4627-0909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial blood gas evaluation is crucial for critically ill patients, as it provides essential information about acid-base metabolism and respiratory balance, but evaluation can be complex and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence can perform tasks that require human intelligence, and it is revolutionizing healthcare through technological advancements.

aimThis study aims to assess arterial blood gas evaluation using artificial intelligence algorithms.

methodsThe study included 21.541 retrospective arterial blood gas samples, categorized into 15 different classes by experts for evaluating acid-base metabolism status. Six machine learning algorithms were utilized; accuracy, balanced accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 values of the models were determined; and ROC curves were drawn to assess areas under the curve for each class. Evaluation of which sample was estimated in which class was conducted using the confusion matrices of the models.

resultsThe bagging classifier (BC) model achieved the highest balanced accuracy with 99.24%, whereas the XGBoost model reached the highest accuracy with 99.66%. The BC model shows 100% sensitivity for nine classes and 100% specificity for 10 classes, and the model correctly predicted 6438 of 6463 test samples and achieved an accuracy of 99.61%, with an area under the curve > 0.9 in all classes on a class basis.

conclusionThe machine learning models developed exhibited remarkable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in predicting the status of acid-base metabolism. However, implementing these models can aid clinicians, freeing up their time for more intricate tasks.

Indexed as

Acid-Base EquilibriumBlood Gas AnalysisMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityAcid–base metabolismArterial blood gasArtificial IntelligenceMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39088159
PMCPMC11860982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.