Observational studyPituitary2024
Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of patients with acromegaly according to tumor size at diagnosis.
Observational study in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current treatment landscape of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Pituitary adenoma imaging as a determinant of acromegaly diagnosis and outcomes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Consensus on acromegaly complications: an update.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Factors affecting disease control after pituitary tumor resection in acromegaly: What is the current evidence?World journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and Predictors of Remission in Patients with Acromegaly Undergoing Microscopic or Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery: Long-Term Outcomes from a Tertiary Care Centre.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate clinical, laboratory, radiological, therapeutic, and prognostic characteristics of patients with acromegaly according to the size of the growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma at diagnosis.
methodsObservational, retrospective, single-center study of patients with acromegaly followed at a tertiary center. Data were collected regarding clinical presentation, characteristics of the adenoma in the magnetic resonance imaging, GH and IGF-1 levels, and disease control after surgery or adjuvant treatment (normal IGF-1 levels). Patients were divided according to the adenoma size at diagnosis in: group I < 10 mm; II 10-19 mm; III 20-29 mm; IV 30-39 mm; and V ≥ 40 mm. Comparisons were made between the groups, and correlations of tumor size with disease parameters, ROC curves, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate tumor size and confounding factors that could impact the outcomes.
results117 patients were studied [59 women, age at diagnosis 43 ± 13 years; group I = 11 patients (9%); group II 54 (46%); group III 34 (29%); group IV 10 (9%); group V 8 (7%)]. Hypopituitarism, cavernous sinus invasion, GH levels, and use of somatostatin receptor ligands had their prevalence increased according to the adenoma size. Age showed a negative correlation with tumor size. A tumor diameter around 20 mm was the best predictor for the presence of hypopituitarism, invasiveness, need of adjuvant therapies, and poorer disease control.
conclusionAdenomas < 20 mm showed lower morbidity and better therapeutic response in acromegaly, while those ≥ 20 mm had similar clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39088137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.