Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088126›Full record

ReviewDermatology and therapy2024

Current Treatments for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Narrative Summary of a Systematic Literature Search.

Lluís Puig, Hideki Fujita, Diamant Thaçi, Min Zheng, Ana Cristina Hernandez Daly, Craig Leonardi, Mark G Lebwohl, Jonathan Barker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lluís PuigDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain. LPuig@santpau.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-0952
Hideki FujitaNihon University, Tokyo, Japan.
Diamant ThaçiUniversity of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Min ZhengDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ana Cristina Hernandez DalyBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Craig LeonardiCentral Dermatology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mark G LebwohlIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jonathan BarkerSt. John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic and potentially life-threatening autoinflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread eruption of sterile pustules, with or without systemic inflammation. GPP can significantly reduce patients' quality of life (QoL). Several therapeutic approaches have been described in the literature, but there is no consensus on optimal treatment. In this review, we summarize published literature on efficacy, safety and QoL outcomes associated with current treatment of GPP with both approved and non-approved products. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched (1980-September 2023). A search protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42021215437). Details on publication, population, intervention, efficacy, safety and QoL were captured and checked by independent reviewers. In total, 118 publications were included, with only 19% of publications reporting on the results of clinical trials. Treatment modalities reported for GPP included non-biologic systemic therapies such as retinoids, cyclosporine and methotrexate, topical agents, biologics and small molecules, among others. Results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low, with only the interleukin-36R inhibitor spesolimab reporting results from placebo-controlled randomized trials; based on this, spesolimab is now approved for GPP treatment in regions including the USA, Japan, China, the EU and several other countries. Some other biologics are approved exclusively in Japan and Taiwan for the treatment of GPP based on open-label studies with small patient numbers in lieu of double-blind studies. Non-standardization of clinical outcomes across studies remains a major hurdle in reaching a consensus on optimal treatment. However, recently trials have been conducted using well-defined, disease-specific endpoints to evaluate GPP-targeted treatments, which will hopefully advance patient care. In conclusion, this review highlights the need for prospective randomized studies with GPP-specific endpoints to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Indexed as

AutoinflammationGeneralized pustular psoriasisGPPIL-36R inhibitorNeutrophilic dermatosesPsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID39088126
PMCPMC11393368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.