Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088107›Full record

ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2024

Perforator-based local flaps for cutaneous facial reconstruction.

Khaled Mohamed Abdel Azeem, Sarah Mohamed Abdelghany Abdelaal, Mohamed Fathi Abdel Maguid, Philobater Bahgat Adly Awad, Basma Hussein Abdelaziz Hassan, Wael Mohamed El Shaer, Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Khaled Mohamed Abdel AzeemPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Sarah Mohamed Abdelghany AbdelaalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Mohamed Fathi Abdel MaguidPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Philobater Bahgat Adly AwadGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Basma Hussein Abdelaziz HassanGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. basmabasam0100667@med.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-9714
Wael Mohamed El ShaerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Mostafa Fathy Ibrahim AhmedPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the advancement of reconstructive surgical techniques, facial defect reconstruction has been always very challenging, aesthetic satisfaction has often been difficult to achieve due to the unique characteristics and complexity of the facial tissue. There have been various options regarding reconstruction and compensation of soft tissue loss all over the body rather than the face. Regardless of whether skin grafts, local flaps, and free flaps were used in the reconstruction process, each of them has its limitations. Beginning with skin grafts results could not always be satisfactory due to contracture, color, and lack of texture Additionally, local flaps have limitations due to mobility and the availability of overlapping skin and tissue, as well as the bulkiness of the pedicle which may need a second staged surgery and lately the difficulty of the free flaps and being a major surgery.

resultsPatients ages ranged between 23 and 77 years old, with a mean age of 58.33 ± 12.47. As regards the patients' sex, 63.3% of our patients were males and 36.7% were females. Co-morbidities were found in 60% of cases (DM 23.3%, HTN 20%, HCV 3.3%, cardiac 3.3%). Most flaps were facial artery perforator flaps 53.3%, then transverse facial artery 26.7%, superficial temporal artery 10%, angular artery 6.7%, and supra-trochlear artery 3.3%. Twenty-ix cases representing 86.7% of cases went uneventful, while complications showed in 4 cases representing 13.3% of cases, 1 case (3.3%) showed venous congestion that was relieved within 24 h after 2 suture releases, another case (3.3%) showed wound dehiscence that was improved after 2 days with regular dressings, the third patient (3.3%) had recurrence after 4 months that was treated by excision and grafting, while last patient (3.3%) had inadequate excision that was treated by radiotherapy. No bleeding or infection occurred. Also, we observed no correlation between flap length and complications. As regards the functional point of view, all patients showed no functional impairment at the donor site, and only one case showed functional impairment at the recipient site. As regards patient satisfaction, all 30 patients achieved positive satisfaction scores using the Likert scale, 18 cases were satisfied, and 12 cases were very satisfied.

conclusionThe use of perforator-based flaps can provide a more effective and aesthetically pleasing solution for the reconstruction of small to moderate facial defects, provided that a reliable Perforator is accurately identified and executed by an experienced surgeon.

Indexed as

BCCFacial soft tissue defectsPerforator-based flaps

Identifiers

PMID39088107
PMCPMC11294309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.