Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39088089›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2024

Addressing neurosurgical challenges in war conflict countries.

Inibehe Ime Okon, Ibad Ur Rehman, Muhammad Ayhan Amir, Imshaal Musharaf, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno Iii, Oday Atallah, Muhammad Kabir Musa, Ephraim Ikoongifono Udokang, Bipin Chaurasia

Abstract readReviewLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Inibehe Ime OkonDepartment of Research, Medical Research Circle (MedReC), Bukavu, DR, Congo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8275-5713
Ibad Ur RehmanShifaTameer-e-millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ayhan AmirShifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Imshaal MusharafJinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno IiiDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Oday AtallahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Muhammad Kabir MusaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-8587
Ephraim Ikoongifono UdokangUniversity of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal. trozexa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-2072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Russo-Ukrainian war caused significant humanitarian and healthcare issues in the Russo-Ukrainian region, which were further aggravated by the escalation of the conflict on February 2022. Because of this ongoing confrontation between the two nations, which has its roots in geopolitical conflicts and historical events, there have been nearly 4 million refugees in only the first month, and 906 healthcare institutions have sustained significant damage. Consequently, the demand for medical services has increased, adding onto the burden of the pre-existing problems within the region's healthcare system, such as inequities, budget shortages, and corruption. With nearly 500,000 military deaths and an estimated 27,1499 civilian casualties, the war's immediate health effects are devastating. Due to inadequate disease surveillance and difficulties with immunization, the risk of infectious illnesses, particularly HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, increased. Although there were originally few mental health problems, the long-term effects are yet unknown. Some of the indirect effects are the severe refugee situation, the burden on public infrastructure, and problems with the security of food and water. Unprecedented obstacles confronted neurosurgery in the Russo-Ukrainian region, including increased patient loads from war-related cases, resource limitations, and facility devastation. Many countries stepped up to aid in managing neurosurgeries however, the some of the problems still persisted, such as insufficient sterility and power outages. Strengthened security standards, financial incentives, telemedicine services, and cooperation with international medical organizations are the main points of recovery recommendations. Rebuilding the region's healthcare system and guaranteeing ongoing foreign support after the conflict require a comprehensive strategy that addresses both short- and long-term issues.

Indexed as

Armed ConflictsNeurosurgeryHumansMilitary MedicineNeurosurgical ProceduresRefugeesUkraineWarfareGlobal HealthNeurosurgicalNeurotraumaRusso-ukrainian warWar

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.