Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087986›Full record

RevieweLife2024

Fundamental processes in sensorimotor learning: Reasoning, refinement, and retrieval.

Jonathan S Tsay, Hyosub E Kim, Samuel D McDougle, Jordan A Taylor, Adrian Haith, Guy Avraham, John W Krakauer, Anne G E Collins, Richard B Ivry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Detrimental Effect of Stroke on Motor Adaptation.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Motor working memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Implicit adaptation's effect on sensorimotor and motor confidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan S TsayDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3992-9023
Hyosub E KimSchool of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-593X
Samuel D McDougleDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8100-4238
Jordan A TaylorDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States.
Adrian HaithDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5658-8654
Guy AvrahamDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-1041
John W KrakauerDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4316-1846
Anne G E CollinsDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-3662
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4728-5130

Funding

Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
Approaching sensorimotor learning from another angle: Exploring and leveraging different cognitive strategies for improving motor performanceR01NS131552 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI JORDAN A TAYLOR · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883NINDS NIH HHS R35NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor learning is often viewed as a unitary process that operates outside of conscious awareness. This perspective has led to the development of sophisticated models designed to elucidate the mechanisms of implicit sensorimotor learning. In this review, we argue for a broader perspective, emphasizing the contribution of explicit strategies to sensorimotor learning tasks. Furthermore, we propose a theoretical framework for motor learning that consists of three fundamental processes: reasoning, the process of understanding action-outcome relationships; refinement, the process of optimizing sensorimotor and cognitive parameters to achieve motor goals; and retrieval, the process of inferring the context and recalling a control policy. We anticipate that this '3R' framework for understanding how complex movements are learned will open exciting avenues for future research at the intersection between cognition and action.

Indexed as

LearningCognitionHumansPsychomotor Performancecognitive scienceexpertiselearningmotor controlmotor learningneuroscienceskill acquisition

Identifiers

PMID39087986
PMCPMC11293869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.