ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Recurrence in Eyelid Sebaceous Carcinoma: A Multicentric Study of 418 Patients.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cholesterol metabolism dysregulation in eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma and its clinical significance.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Treatment Delay and Risk of Orbital Exenteration in Periocular Sebaceous Carcinoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2026Article
- Regional Lymph Node Metastasis in Sebaceous Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Histopathological spectrum of ocular masses in a tertiary eye center in Northern China: a 12-year retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Proteomics reveals the regulation of ALG1 expression by lentivirus-mediated THBS1 overexpression and its mechanism in meibomian gland carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Clinical presentation and prognostic factors of eyelid sebaceous carcinoma.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Eyelid Malignancy: A 17-Year Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Management and Reconstruction Techniques.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- Impact of clinicopathological features of meibomian gland adenocarcinoma on the outcomes of surgical resection combined with eyelid reconstruction.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Local recurrence predicts dismal prognosis in eyelid sebaceous carcinoma (SC). Recurrence predictors vary across studies. Accurate recurrence estimation is essential for individualized therapy in eyelid SC. This study aims to identify recurrence predictors and develop a nomogram for personalized prediction in eyelid SC. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Chart reviews were performed in 418 consecutive patients with eyelid SC. All patients were followed up after their initial surgery. Multivariate Cox regression was used to explore the independent predictors of recurrence. A nomogram for recurrence prediction was developed and validated with bootstrap resampling. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were compared with the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system. Results: Over a median of 60-month follow-up, 167 patients (40%) had local recurrence. The median time from diagnosis to recurrence was 14 months. The 1-year cumulative recurrence rate was 18%. Diagnostic delay (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.01, P = 0.001), orbital involvement (HR = 4.47, 95% CI = 3.04-6.58, P < 0.001), Ki67 (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.008) and initial surgery of Mohs micrographic surgery with intraoperative frozen section control (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.35-0.80, P = 0.003) were independent influencing factors of recurrence. A nomogram integrating these four factors combined with pagetoid spread displayed satisfactory discriminative ability (C-index = 0.80-0.83; area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82-0.84), which compared favorably than TNM staging (all P < 0.05). Conclusions: The recurrence rate is high in eyelid SC. Early detection and primary resection with Mohs micrographic surgery are recommended in controlling recurrence. Patients with orbital involvement, high Ki67 expression, and pagetoid spread may require adjuvant measures. This nomogram offers more accurate recurrence estimates, aiding in therapeutic decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.