Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087881›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2024

Cortical-subcortical interactions underlie processing of auditory predictions measured with 7T fMRI.

Alberto Ara, Vasiliki Provias, Kevin Sitek, Emily B J Coffey, Robert J Zatorre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alberto AraMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5468-8216
Vasiliki ProviasInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), 90 Vincent-d'Indy Avenue, Outremont, QC H2V 2S9, Canada.
Kevin SitekDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, 60208 IL, USA.
Emily B J CoffeyInternational Laboratory for Brain, Music and Sound Research (BRAMS), 90 Vincent-d'Indy Avenue, Outremont, QC H2V 2S9, Canada.
Robert J ZatorreMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, 3801 University Street, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.

Funding

Investigating human non-lemniscal inferior colliculus contributions to auditory learning with 7T MRIK01DC019421 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kevin Richard Sitek · 2022 to 2026
$710k
Canada Research Chairs ProgramCIHRConcordia University Research ChairFondation pour l'Audition FPA RD-2021-6Fonds de recherche du QuébecFonds de Recherche du QuébecNational Institutes of Health/National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders K01DC019421Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC019421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception integrates both sensory inputs and internal models of the environment. In the auditory domain, predictions play a critical role because of the temporal nature of sounds. However, the precise contribution of cortical and subcortical structures in these processes and their interaction remain unclear. It is also unclear whether these brain interactions are specific to abstract rules or if they also underlie the predictive coding of local features. We used high-field 7T functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate interactions between cortical and subcortical areas during auditory predictive processing. Volunteers listened to tone sequences in an oddball paradigm where the predictability of the deviant was manipulated. Perturbations in periodicity were also introduced to test the specificity of the response. Results indicate that both cortical and subcortical auditory structures encode high-order predictive dynamics, with the effect of predictability being strongest in the auditory cortex. These predictive dynamics were best explained by modeling a top-down information flow, in contrast to unpredicted responses. No error signals were observed to deviations of periodicity, suggesting that these responses are specific to abstract rule violations. Our results support the idea that the high-order predictive dynamics observed in subcortical areas propagate from the auditory cortex.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultabstract rulesauditory expectancycortical–subcortical interactionshigh-field fMRIpredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID39087881
PMCPMC11292673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.