Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087552›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery2024

Shared care for patients with a left ventricular assist device: a scoping review.

Valérie C E Drost, Luuk C Otterspoor, Casper F Zijderhand, Jelena Sjatskig, Jolanda Kluin, Rudolf A De Boer, Kadir Caliskan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reply to 'Beyond socioeconomic status: structural determinants and strategic approaches to regional variation in left ventricular assist device utilization'.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Left ventricular assist device utilization across the different regions of the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valérie C E DrostThoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-9307-5513
Luuk C OtterspoorDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8510-8648
Casper F ZijderhandDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-1334
Jelena SjatskigDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2360-0853
Jolanda KluinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5942-4727
Rudolf A De BoerThoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4775-9140
Kadir CaliskanThoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-9261

Funding

Abbott Medical Netherlands E-APC 2023-HF-79
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly implanted in patients with advanced heart failure. Currently, LVAD care is predominantly concentrated at specialized tertiary care hospitals. However, the increasing workload and logistical burden for implanting centres pose significant challenges to accessing care for individual patients in remote areas. An emerging approach to LVAD patient management is the use of a shared care model (SCM), which facilitates collaboration between implanting centres and local non-implanting hospitals. This scoping review explores and synthesizes the current scientific evidence on the use of SCMs in LVAD care management. Eligible studies were identified in EMBASE, PubMed MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar. Findings were synthesized in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Of the 950 records screened, five articles met the inclusion criteria. Four review articles focused on the proposed benefits and challenges of using SCMs. Main benefits included improved patient satisfaction and continuity of care. Important challenges were initial education of non-implanting centre staff and maintaining competency. One prospective study showed that absence of LVAD-specific care was associated with impaired survival and higher rates of pump thrombosis and LVAD-related infections. The use of SCMs is a promising approach in the long-term management of LVAD patients. However, sufficient evidence about the impact of SCMs on patients and the healthcare system is not currently available. Standardized protocols based on prospective studies are needed to develop safe and effective shared care for LVAD patients.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHumansDestination therapyLeft ventricular assist devicePatient managementScoping reviewShared care

Identifiers

PMID39087552
PMCPMC11368409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.