ArticleEFORT open reviews2024
Efficacy and safety of topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of topical combined with intravenous administration of tranexamic acid in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Tranexamic acid effectively reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in musculoskeletal tumor surgery with acceptable safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Evidence on oral tranexamic acid versus intravenous tranexamic acid for perioperative blood management in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effects of topical tranexamic acid (tTXA) in spinal surgery to provide reliable clinical evidence for its usefulness. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were comprehensively searched to identify randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of tTXA on blood loss during spine surgery. The observation indexes were intraoperative blood loss, total blood loss, output and duration of postoperative drainage, postoperative hematological variables, length of postoperative hospital stay, blood transfusion rate, and complication rate. Results: A total of 21 studies involving 1774 patients were included. Our results showed that the use of tTXA during spinal surgery significantly reduced the total blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative transfusion rate, duration of postoperative drainage, and postoperative hospital stay, and increased the serum hemoglobin concentration, thereby providing better clinical outcomes for surgical patients. However, tTXA had no effect on intraoperative blood loss and associated complications. Conclusion: On the basis of the available evidence, the present results provide strong clinical evidence of the clinical value of tTXA in spinal surgery and provide an important reference for future research and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.