Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087457›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Pregnancy after advanced ovarian cancer with spontaneous uterine rupture in second trimester: A case report and review of the literature.

Stefan Lukac, Robin Wenzel, Fabienne Schochter, Ulrike Friebe-Hoffmann, Beate Hüner, Wolfgang Janni

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pregnancy after advanced ovarian cancer with spontaneous uterine rupture in second trimester: A case report and review of the literature.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan LukacDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9336-2267
Robin WenzelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Fabienne SchochterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-6494
Ulrike Friebe-HoffmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-9741
Beate HünerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-5642
Wolfgang JanniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5911-2400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility-preserving surgery (FPS) in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) is extremely rare and consequently, information about the pregnancies of these patients is anecdotal. Therefore, management of the pregnancy after AOC is challenging, especially if an unexpected situation arises. A 31-year-old nulliparous woman was admitted to our tertiary hospital in the 18th week of twin pregnancy with sudden severe abdominal pain. Her medical history included a low-grade AOC stage IIIc diagnosed 2 years before pregnancy and treated by debulking FPS and systemic therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel and bevacizumab. Clinical examination described normal vital signs and peritoneal irritation without any vaginal discharge. Sonography revealed free fluid in the pouch of Douglas and intact twin pregnancy. Laboratory work showed elevated leukocytes with neutrophilia. To evaluate appendicitis magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen was indicated. This revealed a uterine rupture with the now extra-cavitary position of the twins. Simultaneously, the patient's symptoms deteriorated, and emergency surgery was necessary where hemoperitoneum with avital fetuses were present. Despite excessive blood loss the uterus could be repaired and preserved. Previous resection of the uterine serosa during her debulking FPS, administration of bevacizumab affecting smooth muscles, and overstretching the uterus in the twin pregnancy were considered as possible risk factors for the presenting uterine rupture. Pregnancy after AOC is possible but should be monitored closely, especially due to the hidden long-term consequences of its therapy. In the differential diagnosis of sudden abdominal pain during pregnancy uterine rupture should be considered even in patients with an unscared uterus.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy, TwinUterine RuptureAdultFemaleFertility PreservationHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, Neoplasticadvanced ovarian cancerfertility‐preserving surgerysecond trimesterspontaneous uterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID39087457
PMCPMC11649888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.