ArticleCureus2024
Perceptions of Stakeholders and the Way Forward to Implementing the Family Adoption Programme in Medical Education: A Study From Assam, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Perception Regarding Family Adoption Program among the Undergraduate Students of a Medical College in Coastal South India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- The Family Adoption Program Experience of MBBS Students in North India: A Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- An Investigation of the Effectiveness of the Family Adoption Program Among Undergraduate Medical Students.Cureus · 2025Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on the Family Adoption Program in a Newly Established Rural Medical College, Odisha: A Qualitative Study.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Family Adoption Programme (FAP) has been introduced under the competency-based medical education curriculum wherein each medical student adopts families. The objective of this study was to determine the stakeholders' perspective and to suggest measures to make it relevant for Indian medical graduates. Methodology A mixed-method study was conducted among the faculty, undergraduate students, and community using prestructured, validated instruments. The quantitative data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) and analysed, while the qualitative data were coded and analysed thematically. Results All faculty members (12, 100%), the majority of students (49, 44.30%), and the community members strongly agreed that the policy decision to introduce the FAP was 'right'. The benefits mentioned were that FAP helps improve knowledge, psychomotor skills, attitudes and communication, attitude and behaviour skills, understanding of the social structures, health status of the community, and health-seeking behaviour of the families and provides an appropriate early clinical exposure. The challenges mentioned were selecting a site, gaining cooperation from family, communication, arrangement of logistics and transportation, getting support from teachers, difficulties in managing students in the community and coordinating among faculty, staff and students. Most faculty members recommended that the FAP should be started later in the curriculum and there should be restrictions on the number of families to be adopted. The students suggested that adequate logistics be provided as well as a reduction in the number of family visits. Conclusion The programme has been welcomed by most stakeholders. It requires the necessary support from the institution authorities, prior planning of visits, judicious utilization of social media, and coordination with government field-level health workers e.g. Accreditated Social Health Activists (ASHA). A comprehensive program evaluation and formulation of a standard operating module will further strengthen the programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.