Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087160›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Role of Uterine Artery Doppler Study Between 11 and 14 Weeks as a Predictor of Preeclampsia.

Karpagam Rk, Karthik Krishna Ramakrishnan, Dhivya Gunasekaran, Arun Aram, Paarthipan Natarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karpagam RkDepartment of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Karthik Krishna RamakrishnanDepartment of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Dhivya GunasekaranDepartment of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Arun AramDepartment of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Paarthipan NatarajanDepartment of Radiology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Preeclampsia is a serious complication marked by antepartum hemorrhage, resulting in severe maternal and fetal complications. Predicting this condition using placental dysfunction assessments, such as uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, is challenging due to the placenta's evolving structural and biochemical characteristics throughout different stages of pregnancy. Objectives To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the uterine artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (PI) and Resistive Index (RI) in predicting preeclampsia. To compare the Doppler ultrasound measurements between normal pregnancies and those that develop preeclampsia. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in predicting gestational hypertension in addition to preeclampsia. Methodology Conducted as a prospective study, 116 antenatal mothers with computed gestational ages and scan gestational ages between 11 and 14 weeks, and a previous history of preeclampsia were included. Subjects with chronic hypertension or multiple gestations were excluded. Participants underwent uterine artery Doppler screening, during which the PI and RI were measured upon obtaining three consecutive similar waveforms, and the mean PI of the left and right arteries was calculated. The outcomes of patients with normal pregnancies and those who developed preeclampsia were compared. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The mean PI among participants was 1.75 (±0.38), with a range from 1 to 2.75. The mean RI was 0.58 (±0.08), ranging from 0.45 to 0.8. The cutoff for the mean PI in predicting preeclampsia was 2.27, which showed a sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 97.1%, PPV of 81.47%, NPV of 99.01%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.59% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.982). The cutoff for the mean RI for predicting preeclampsia was 0.695, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 85.47%, NPV of 98.04%, and diagnostic accuracy of 96.52% (AUC: 0.965). In predicting gestational hypertension, the cutoff for the mean PI was 1.975, with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82.9%, PPV of 17.41%, NPV of 98.92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.78% (AUC: 0.848). The cutoff for the mean RI in predicting gestational hypertension was 0.615, showing a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 80.2%, PPV of 15.4%, NPV of 98.89%, and diagnostic accuracy of 80.19% (AUC: 0.767). Conclusion The research demonstrated that aberrant readings in uterine Doppler ultrasound, specifically in the PI and RI, possess strong overall validity in forecasting the occurrence of preeclampsia.

Indexed as

gestational agepreeclampsiapregnancy induced hypertension (pih)pulsatility index (pi)resistive index (ri)uterine artery doppler

Identifiers

PMID39087160
PMCPMC11290376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.