ReviewCureus2024
Return to Activity Following Isolated Ulnar Nerve Surgery: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulnar neuropathy is one of the more commonly diagnosed mononeuropathies; despite this, a definitive surgical treatment strategy has not been widely agreed upon. In this study, we systematically review the literature and assess return to play or activity outcomes in patients with neuritis or neuropathy undergoing in situ decompression, subcutaneous transposition, or submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve. We hypothesized that ulnar nerve transposition or decompression in the absence of concomitant ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) pathology would have a high rate of return to activity. Relevant studies were generated from 1975 to 2023 using PubMed, Academic Search Complete, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus. Articles reporting on return to play or activity outcomes following isolated ulnar nerve transposition or decompression for ulnar neuritis were included. Studies evaluating patients with concomitant UCL injury or revision surgery were excluded. A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, ranging from 1977 to 2021. There were a total of 358 patients with a reported return to play or activity status across all studies with an average age of 27.2 years (range, 11-75). Successful return to play, activity, or work was reported in 303 patients (84.6%). Patients undergoing transposition, subcutaneous (n = 232) and submuscular (n = 20), had return rates of 87.9% and 95%, respectively. Patients undergoing in situ decompression (n = 106) had return rates of 75.5%. This systematic review found an 84.6% return to activity rate following ulnar nerve transposition or decompression in the absence of concomitant UCL pathology. Overall, transposition or decompression of the ulnar nerve provides a favorable return to activity rates and with appropriate indications and surgical technique will likely yield a successful return.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.