Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087059›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT2024

Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naba AliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bree R EatonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jeffrey M SwitchenkoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Yichun CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William A StokesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pretesh R PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Katja M LangenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Roelf SlopsemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jeffrey D BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mark W McDonaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment. Patients and methods: From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS). Results: All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores. Conclusion: Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

Indexed as

proton therapystereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR)stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)

Identifiers

PMID39087059
PMCPMC11288653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.