Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39087054›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024

Autologous Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate (BMAC) Therapy for Primary Knee Osteoarthritis-An Observational and Dose Escalation Study.

Madhan Jeyaraman, K S Karthik, Dinesh Choudary, Naveen Jeyaraman, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Swaminathan Ramasubramian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative outcome analyses of subchondralWorld journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9493
K S KarthikDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine-Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095 India.
Dinesh ChoudaryDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine-Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095 India.
Naveen JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4362-3326
Arulkumar NallakumarasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077 India.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-2883
Swaminathan RamasubramianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Omandurar Government Estate, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600002 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-8427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties maximize the therapeutic potential of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) in osteoarthritis (OA) knee. There is a lack of studies to standardize the treatment procedure to make the studies done across various centers comparable to understand the lacunae better and develop further the deficiency in our understanding of BMAC for OA knee. We aimed to assess the degree of pain relief, functional outcome, and cartilage thickness with different doses of BMAC in primary OA knee. Materials and Methods: A single-centered prospective observational study was conducted with 80 patients of OA knee who were divided into 4 groups where group A ( Results: The study found no significant differences in demographics or co-morbidities across four participant groups (A, B, C, D). However, clinical outcomes varied markedly: Groups B and C showed significant improvements in pain perception (VAS scores), knee function, and quality of life (KOOS and WOMAC scores), while Group A showed marginal or non-significant changes, and Group D exhibited no significant improvements. These findings suggest that treatments in Groups B and C reached the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, significantly enhancing patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: A dose of 2 million BMAC cells per kg body weight for knee OA serves as the better regenerative modality of choice in cartilage regeneration. With our dose-escalation study, we would be able to standardize the treatment procedure and enable global comparison of the treatment method across various regions of the world. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

BMACDose escalationKneeMesenchymal stromal cellsOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID39087054
PMCPMC11286920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.