ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2024
Decoding the Decade: Exploring the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Complex Wound Management - A Comprehensive Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of single-spin to double-spin platelet-rich plasma centrifugation methods in the treatment of androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Cord Blood-Derived Platelet Gel in Wound Healing: From Biological Rationale to Clinical Application.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has emerged as a promising regenerative treatment modality, offering potential improvements in healing outcomes through its rich content of growth factors and cytokines. We evaluated the effectiveness of PRP therapy in the management of complex wounds, using a decade-long retrospective analysis of treatments conducted at a tertiary care center from 2010 to 2020. The study introduces and assesses the efficacy of the Sandeep's Technique for Assisted Regeneration of Skin (STARS) in enhancing wound healing and quality of life for patients with complex wounds. Materials and methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted, involving two phases: the development and initial testing of PRP therapy (2010-2015) and the application and evaluation of the STARS protocol (2015-2020). The study included patients with complex wounds, utilizing autologous PRP prepared through a double spin centrifuge technique. Outcome measures included wound-healing rates, infection management, and complication rates, compared to conventional treatment methods. Results: The study treated 500 wounds in 432 patients with autologous PRP, noting significant improvements in wound-healing rates, 97.7% had infection control without antibiotics (even in MRSA cases), and all had a good pain control. Histopathological examinations confirmed collagen-rich healing with minimal scarring. The STARS protocol demonstrated the potential of PRP therapy in accelerating wound healing, reducing the need for additional surgical interventions, and enhancing patient outcomes. Conclusion: PRP therapy, particularly when administered following the STARS protocol, represents a safe, effective, and patient-friendly approach for the management of complex wounds. This study supports the integration of PRP therapy into regenerative care strategies, suggesting a shift toward more innovative and efficacious treatments in wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.