ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Thromboelastogram and coagulation function index: relevance for female breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrombopoiesis meets tumorigenesis: unlocking the diagnostic and prognostic potential of platelet indices in breast cancer- a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Thromboelastographic Assessment of Coagulation Profiles in Dogs with Cardiac Tumors and Their Relationship to Cardiac Function.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Coagulation indices and fibrinogen degradation products as predictive biomarkers for tumor-node-metastasis staging and metastasis in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction model of gastrointestinal tumor malignancy based on coagulation indicators such as TEG and neural networks.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Blood hypercoagulability and thrombosis mechanisms in cancer patients -A brief review.Heliyon · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Screening and postoperative intervention of breast tumors are critical for the effective diagnosis and treatment of disease development, and reliable diagnostic/screening methods become a key link. Objective: Thromboelastogram (TEG), routine platelet (PLT) count, and the coagulation function indicators in patients with different breast diseases were determined and analyzed to explore their predictive value in secondary bleeding disorders. Methods: A total of 131 patients with breast diseases, admitted to Jiangsu University Affiliated Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022, were selected as the research subjects. The detection items were analyzed using the receiver operating curve (ROC) after grouping for secondary bleeding disorders of patients with breast cancer. Results: The reaction ( Conclusion: Coagulation tests showed significant differences in patients with breast cancer, differing from those with benign breast diseases. TEG combined with conventional coagulation indicators is potentially valuable for the prediction of secondary bleeding disorders in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.