ReviewFrontiers in neurology2024
Spontaneous calcified cerebral emboli: a comprehensive review and proposed diagnostic criteria.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke Secondary to Calcified Cerebral Emboli: a Systematic Review.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Calcified cerebral emboli-A case series.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Multiple calcific embolism - a rare cause of embolic ischemic stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Vasa vasorum plexus formation in intracranial aneurysm associates with microcalcification and wall thickening.Science advances · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous calcified cerebral emboli (SCCE) secondary to aortic valve calcification are a rare and underreported cause of acute ischaemic stroke. Only five cases of SCCE secondary to bicuspid aortic valve calcification have been reported in the literature. This review includes a unique case example of acute ischaemic stroke secondary to SCCE, as the first manifestation of a calcified bicuspid aortic valve. This is the first clinical case of calcified cerebral emboli (CCE) associated with borderzone infarction ('cortical ribbon sign'). Whilst previously assumed that most CCE are secondary to iatrogenic causes, recent literature suggests the majority of CCE are spontaneous and clinically silent. Despite CT imaging widely considered the 'gold standard' for diagnosis, CCE are frequently misdiagnosed and missed entirely. Misdiagnosis of CCE may have catastrophic consequences due to the high risk of recurrence and missed opportunity to prevent neurological disability and death. This review presents a revised CCE diagnostic criteria, using evidence that has emerged over the last decade to create both Compulsory (Major) and Supporting (Minor) criteria. Current CCE management is not evidence based and remains largely speculative. SCCE may be the first manifestation of cardiac or vascular disease and diagnosis should trigger aggressive treatment of emboligenic sources. Future epidemiological studies, analysing symptomatic and asymptomatic SCCE patients, would be beneficial in providing accurate quantification of disease burden. Other future research directions include exploring intracranial stenting for CCE revascularisation and cerebral intravascular lithotripsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.