Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39086999›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2024

Testing the Significance of Ranked Gene Sets in Genome-wide Transcriptome

Min Yao, Hao He, Binyu Wang, Xinmiao Huang, Sunli Zheng, Jianwu Wang, Xuejun Gao, Tinghua Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Procyanidin-B1-EnrichedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Min YaoCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Hao HeCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Binyu WangCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Xinmiao HuangCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Sunli ZhengCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Jianwu WangCollege of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Xuejun GaoCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.
Tinghua HuangCollege of Animal Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434025, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Popular gene set enrichment analysis approaches assumed that genes in the gene set contributed to the statistics equally. However, the genes in the transcription factors (TFs) derived gene sets, or gene sets constructed by TF targets identified by the ChIP-Seq experiment, have a rank attribute, as each of these genes have been assigned with a p-value which indicates the true or false possibilities of the ownerships of the genes belong to the gene sets. Objectives: Ignoring the rank information during the enrichment analysis will lead to improper statistical inference. We address this issue by developing of new method to test the significance of ranked gene sets in genome-wide transcriptome profiling data. Methods: A method was proposed by first creating ranked gene sets and gene lists and then applying weighted Kendall's tau rank correlation statistics to the test. After introducing top-down weights to the genes in the gene set, a new software called "Flaver" was developed. Results: Theoretical properties of the proposed method were established, and its differences over the GSEA approach were demonstrated when analyzing the transcriptome profiling data across 55 human tissues and 176 human cell-lines. The results indicated that the TFs identified by our method have higher tendency to be differentially expressed across the tissues analyzed than its competitors. It significantly outperforms the well-known gene set enrichment analyzing tools, GOStats (9%) and GSEA (17%), in analyzing well-documented human RNA transcriptome datasets. Conclusions: The method is outstanding in detecting gene sets of which the gene ranks were correlated with the expression levels of the genes in the transcriptome data.

Indexed as

enrichment analysisFlaverGOStatsGSEAranked gene settranscription factorweighted rank correlation

Identifiers

PMID39086999
PMCPMC11288161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.