ArticleCurrent genomics2024
Testing the Significance of Ranked Gene Sets in Genome-wide Transcriptome
Article in Current genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- GraphChIAr: genome-wide super-resolution reconstruction of protein-mediated remote chromatin interactions by augmenting hi-C interaction maps with multiple ChIP-seq profiles.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- African Swine Fever Virus R238L and R298L Disrupt Lung Cell Collagen Formation and Cell Adhesion Pathway by Targeting Transcription Factors Containing zf-C2H2 Domain.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- TransPilot: mining key transcription factors by correlating binding sites with differentially expressed genes.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- SP1-IKBIP axis promotes the proliferation and invasion of glioma with Wnt/β-catenin associated epithelial-mesenchymal transition.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Identification of Regulators for Antigen-Specific CD8Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Procyanidin-B1-EnrichedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Identifying the anti-infection NK and T cell subgroups in preterm newborns with sepsis using single-cell RNA-seq analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Se-methylselenocysteine inhibits inflammatory response in an LPS-stimulated chicken HD11 macrophage-like cell model through the NFKB2 pathway.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Correlating gene expression levels with transcription factor binding sites facilitates identification of key transcription factors from transcriptome data.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Popular gene set enrichment analysis approaches assumed that genes in the gene set contributed to the statistics equally. However, the genes in the transcription factors (TFs) derived gene sets, or gene sets constructed by TF targets identified by the ChIP-Seq experiment, have a rank attribute, as each of these genes have been assigned with a p-value which indicates the true or false possibilities of the ownerships of the genes belong to the gene sets. Objectives: Ignoring the rank information during the enrichment analysis will lead to improper statistical inference. We address this issue by developing of new method to test the significance of ranked gene sets in genome-wide transcriptome profiling data. Methods: A method was proposed by first creating ranked gene sets and gene lists and then applying weighted Kendall's tau rank correlation statistics to the test. After introducing top-down weights to the genes in the gene set, a new software called "Flaver" was developed. Results: Theoretical properties of the proposed method were established, and its differences over the GSEA approach were demonstrated when analyzing the transcriptome profiling data across 55 human tissues and 176 human cell-lines. The results indicated that the TFs identified by our method have higher tendency to be differentially expressed across the tissues analyzed than its competitors. It significantly outperforms the well-known gene set enrichment analyzing tools, GOStats (9%) and GSEA (17%), in analyzing well-documented human RNA transcriptome datasets. Conclusions: The method is outstanding in detecting gene sets of which the gene ranks were correlated with the expression levels of the genes in the transcriptome data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.